摘要
魔鬼在细节之中,魔鬼也在形式中.法律上强调程序公正重于实体公正.也就是说,不仅目的需要符合广大人民群众的根本利益。
出处
《法人》
2004年第11期130-131,共2页
Faren Magazine
同被引文献29
-
1李庆四.美国总统大选辩论及其影响[J].领导科学,2004(22):48-49. 被引量：1
-
2彭伟步.美国总统选举与电视辩论[J].国际新闻界,2004,26(6):11-15. 被引量：3
-
3Althaus, S. (2001). Who' s voted in when the people turn out? Information effects in congressional elections. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (eds.), Communicatioa in U.S. elections: new agendas. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
-
4Asher, H. B. (1988).Presidential elections and American politics: voters, candidates and campaigns since 1952(4th Ed). Chicago: Dorsey Press.
-
5Blais, A. & Boyer, M. M. (1996). Assessing the impact of televised debates: The case of the 1988 Canadian election. British Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 143-164.
-
6Carpini, D. M.X. & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven,CT: Yale University Press.
-
7Fein, S., Goethals, G. R. & Kugler, M. B.(2007). Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates.Political Psychology, 28(2), 165-192.
-
8Fridkin, K. L. et al. (2007). Capturing the power of a campaign event: the 2004 presidential debate in Tempe. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 770-785.
-
9Geer, J. G. (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate' s preferences for candidates. American Politics Research, 16(4), 486-501.
-
10Germond, J. W. & Witcover, J. (1985). Wake us when it's over." presidentialpolitics of 1984. New York: Macmillan Pub Co.
-
1李德祥.提高基层党建工作科学化水平的对策建议[J].湖北函授大学学报,2016,29(7):79-80. 被引量：6
-
2卞庆祖.展望2008年美国大选[J].和平与发展,2008(2):33-36.
-
3李庆四.美国总统大选辩论及其影响[J].领导科学,2004(22):48-49. 被引量：1
-
4牛新春.从初选辩论看美国全球战略[J].和平与发展,2007(4):34-37.
-
5美国大选辩论掩盖中美关系实质[J].南方人物周刊,2012(37):9-9.
-
6美报：中国还算不上传统意义的超级大国[J].质量探索,2008,0(7):19-20.
-
7佩里.史密斯,汪析.从数字13看复杂的中国[J].今日国土,2008(7):21-21.
-
8赵灵敏.大选辩论能改变什么2[J].南方人物周刊,2012(37):23-23.
-
9连清川.谁是"最后的说谎者"——两场总统大选辩论旁观[J].南风窗,2004(10X):74-76. 被引量：2
-
10李庆四.美国大选辩论:高超的政治游戏[J].新闻周刊,2004(39):39-41.
