5Fenech M. The advantages and disadvantanges of the cytoki-nesisblock micronucleus method . Mutat Res, 1997,392 (1-2): 11
6Gee P,Maron D M,Ames B N . Detection and classification of mutagens:a set of base-specific Salmonella tester strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1994,91(24):11606
7Ames B N. anenthusiasm for metabolism. Biol Chem,2003,278(7):4369
8Aardema M J,Albertinis,Arni P, et al. Aneuploidy:a report of an ECETOC task force .Mutat Res,1998,410(1):3
6Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P, Birincioglu M, et al. Free radical - induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement [J] . Free Rad Bio & Med, 2002,32(11) : 1 102- 1 115.
7Dizdaroglu M. Oxidative damage to DNA in mammalian chromatin[J] .Mutat Res, 1992,275:331 - 342.
8McKelvey - Martin V J, Green MH, Schmezer P, et al. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay(comet assay): A European review[J] . Murat Res, 1993, 288:47 - 63.
9Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, et al. A simple technique for low levels of DNA damage in individual cells[J] . Exp Cell Res, 1988,175: 184- 191.
10Anderson D, Yu TW, Phillips BJ, et al. The effect of various antioxid ants and other modifying agents on oxygen- radical- generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the COMET assay[J] . Muta Res,1994,307:261 - 271.
