期刊文献+

非言语型学习障碍儿童选择注意功能的神经心理特性 被引量:9

Neuropsychological characteristics of selective attention in children with nonverbal learning disabilities
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨非言语型学习障碍 (NLD)儿童选择注意功能相关的大脑额叶注意调控、工作记忆、注意维持等神经心理功能特点。方法 采用听觉辨别实验 (ADT)、威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)及中国修订版韦氏学龄儿童智力量表 (C WISC)对 14例NLD儿童和 2 3名正常儿童进行测试 ,并对C WISC各类分测验成绩进行了因子分析。结果 NLD组儿童ADT测试中的正确反应率明显低于对照组 (P <0 0 1) ,错误反应数多于对照组 (P <0 0 1) ;在WCST测试中其 2次的分类完成数 (CA)和持续性错误次数 (PE)成绩均显著低于对照组 (P <0 0 5 ) ;因子分析表明 ,与视觉空间功能相关的知觉组织因子和与注意维持功能相关的不分心因子明显低于对照组 (P <0 0 1,P <0 0 5 )。结论NLD儿童存在额叶为主的注意调控功能和工作记忆障碍 。 Objective To investigate the neuropsychological characteristics of selective attention such as attention control, working memory and attention persistence of frontal lobe in children with nonverbal learning disabilities (NLD). Methods With Auditory Detection Test (ADT), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and C-WISC, 14 children with NLD and 23 controls were tested and the results of sub-tests of C-WISC were analyzed with factor analysis. ADT was mainly applied to test the ability of auditory discernment and the function of dominance lateralization in the cerebra; WCST was employed to test the function of working memory which was based on the frontal lobe, and, C-WISC, to test the intelligent structure and characteristics. Results Compared with control group, the correct response rate of ADT in NLD group was much lower (P<0.01), and the number of incorrect response was much larger (P<0.01).Children with NLD had deficits of auditory selective attention. Moreover, the number of categories achieved (CA) and perseverative error (PE) of WCST were much lower (P<0.05), which indicated that children with NLD had the disorders of selective attention and performance function. Factor analysis showed that perceptual organization (PO) related to visual space and freedom from distractibility (FD) related to attention persistence in NLD group were obviously lower than those in control group (P<0.01,P<0.05). These findings further supported the above-mentioned results. Conclusions Children with NLD had attention control disorder and working memory disorder mainly in frontal lobe; we suppose that the disorder in right frontal lobe was distinctive.
出处 《中华儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第9期705-707,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ( 3 0 0 70 2 64 ) 广东省重点科技项目基金 ( 2KM0 460 4W)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Baddeley A. Working memory or working attention? In:Baddenly A, Weiskrantz L, eds. Attention: Selection, Awareness and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.152-170.
  • 2Cohen RA. The Neuropsychology of Attention. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1993.45-104.
  • 3Myklebust HR. Disorder of social perception the right hemisphere syndrome. Adv Neurol Sci, 1998,42:409-418.
  • 4Mahone EM, Miller TL, Koth CW, et al. Differences between WISC-R and WISC-Ⅲ performance scale among children with ADHD. Psychol Sch, 2003,40: 331-340.
  • 5Gazzaniga MS. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Dose the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain, 2000,123:1293-1326.
  • 6中根晃 编.ADHD临床手册(日文)[M].东京:金刚出版,2002.187-213.
  • 7世界卫生组织(WHO).精神与行为障碍分类临床描述与诊断要点(ICD-10)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.190-196.
  • 8龚耀先 蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表(C-WISC)手册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993..
  • 9刘哲宁.Wisconsin卡片分类测验的临床运用[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),1999,26(1):6-9. 被引量:95
  • 10静进,钟细霞,郭靖.学习障碍儿童深度觉辨别与情感认知的关系[J].中华儿科杂志,1999,37(3):148-151. 被引量:7

二级参考文献10

  • 1静进 海日罕 等.学习困难儿童触觉辨别特征研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2:156-158.
  • 2安西信雄 丹羽真一.分裂病患者感情认各表出障碍的研究(1)[J].临床精神医学,1985,12:85-95.
  • 3-.日本心理学实验指导研究汇编:实验与测量[M].东京:诚文社,1979.145-178.
  • 4静进.学习障碍儿童主题绘人测验的因素分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1995,3(3):157-160.
  • 5查尔斯L.赫林.项目反应理论在心理测量中的应用[M].湖北教育出版社,1990..
  • 6静进,中国临床心理学杂志,1994年,2卷,156页
  • 7安西信雄,临床精神医学杂志,1985年,12卷,85页
  • 8日本心理学实验指导研究汇编.实验与测量,1979年,145页
  • 9静进,中国临床心理学杂志,1995年,3卷,3期,157页
  • 10查尔斯 L,项目反应理论在心理测量中的应用,1990年

共引文献127

同被引文献171

引证文献9

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部