期刊文献+

论全球食糖生产及其政策 被引量:1

On the Global Sugar Production and Its Policies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 食糖是全球最受政策扭曲的农产品之一。欧盟和美国是主要实施食糖政策扭曲生产和贸易的经济体。随着"多哈议程"谈判的进行,发展中国家要求欧盟和美国改革食糖政策的呼声越来越高。改革食糖政策有利于增进全球福利。最近的研究认为,采用多边方式的改革食糖政策的获益最大,全球取消食糖政策保护1年可获得47亿美元的福利。欧洲和美国每年增加1500万t食糖,可使发展中国家增加上百万个就业机会。本文就全球食糖生产和一些国家的食糖政策作了较为全面的介绍和分析,使我们对世界农产品生产和贸易及政策有比较准确的了解。 Sugar is one of the most policy distorted of agricultural commodities in the world. The European Union and the United States are among the worst offenders. Along with the negotiations of the Doha Agenda, the voice from the developing countries to ask the European Union and the United States to reform sugar policies is getting higher and higher. Reform of sugar policies benefits improvement of world welfare. The benefits of sugar policy reform are greatest under multilateral reform, and according to recent studies, the global welfare gains of removal of all trade protection are estimated to total as much as $ 4.7 bilion a year. In countries with the highest protection (Western Europe, the U.S. Eastern Europe)net imports would increase by an estimated 15 million tons a year, which would create empolyment for nearly one million workers in developing countries. This paper presents and analyses the global sugar production and sugar policies the some counties carry out. The paper aim is to help us precisely understand the global agricultural products and trade policies on sugar.
作者 朱颖
出处 《农业现代化研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期450-454,共5页 Research of Agricultural Modernization
关键词 食糖 价格支持 关税配额 乌拉圭回合 sugar price support tariff rate quota Uruguay Round
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Strong L A G.The Story of Sugar[M].London:Chiswick press,1954:2-42.
  • 2Hannah,A C.International Sugar Organization,London[Z].2001:1-19.
  • 3Harrison,Michelle,King Sugar[M].New York University Press,2001:22-26.
  • 4Bolling Christine, Nydia R Suarez.The brazilian Sugar Industry:Recent Developments[Z].Special Article ,Sugar and Sweetener Situation & Outlook, 2001:11-35.
  • 5Sheales, Terry,Simon Gordon,Ahmed hafi, et al.Sugar International Policies Affecting Market Expansion[Z].ABARE Research Report,1999:99,14,21-36.
  • 6Borrell Brent, David Pearce, Sugar:the taste test of trade liberalization[Z].Center for International Economics, Canberra & Sydney Australia,1999:5-15.
  • 7Lord, Ron .Sugar background for 1995 Farm Legislation[Z].ERS/USDA Agricultural Economic Report,1995,171:4-10.

同被引文献23

  • 1徐雪.世界食糖生产与贸易发展[J].农业展望,2006,2(4):31-35. 被引量:4
  • 2宋士菁,张建清.从战略性贸易政策的视角来看欧盟食糖政策[J].国际贸易问题,2007(1):50-53. 被引量:4
  • 3Abler, O. Beghin, J. C. Blandford, D. Elobeid, A.U.S. sugar policy options and their consequences under NAFTA and Doha.Working Paper - Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University; 2006. (06-WP 424):42 pp.
  • 4Armstrong, Delroy AnthonyThe Potential Impact of Trade Policy Changes on Caribbean Sugar[D].Louisiana State University,2004.
  • 5Elbehri, A.Umstaetter, J.Keich, D.R.The EU Sugar Policy Regime and Implications of Reform.Economic Research Report - Economic P~esearch Service, USDA, 2008. (59): 44pp.
  • 6Elobeid,A .Beghin,J.Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sugar Markets[J].Journai of Agricultural Economics,2006,57(1):23-48.
  • 7Gemmill G. An Equilibrium Analysis of U.S. Sugar Policy. [J] . American Journal of Agrlcuitural Economics, 1977, (4):609.
  • 8Haley.Free Trade Area of the Americas: Consequences for U.S. Sugar[R]. USDA-ERS, Market and Trade Economics Division, Washtngton, D0.2002.
  • 9Heboyan, Vahe; Ames, Glenn C.W.; Gunter, Lewel] F.~ Houston, Jack E. U.S.-MEXICO SUGAR DISPUTE: IMPACT OF NAFTA ON THE SUGAP~ MARKET.2001.
  • 10Leong, J. K. Scott, F. S., Jr. Leung, P. S. Economic implications of import barriers to protect the U.S. sugar industry.Research Series, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Manoa~ 1989. (058):64pp.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部