期刊文献+

健择联用HCPT治疗胰腺癌的临床观察 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价健择(吉西他滨)联用HCPT治疗胰腺癌的疗效及临床受益反应、生存时间、毒副作用。方法对30例胰腺癌病人(病理、影像学及CAl9—9证实)随机分2组:A组对照组(单用健择);B组静脉化疗组(健择加HCPT)。两组健择按1000mg/m^2。,1次/周,联用3周,第4周停用,4周为1周期,共2~3个周期。HC盯剂量为8~10mg/d,连用7~10天。4周为1周期,共2~3周期。治疗前及治疗1周后分别查血常规、肝肾功能、CAl9—9及腹部CT,记录治疗前后临床受益反应(CBR)指标:即对疼痛、体力状况、体重改变、镇痛药用量。结果A、B组均无1例CR,其中A组3例PR(20%),8例SD(53.3%),4例PD(26,7%)。B组5例PR(33,3%),9例SD(60%),l例PD(6.7%);A组PR+SD(73.3%);B组PR+SD(93.3%),两组无显著差异(P>0.05)。合并梗阻性黄疸者共有12例,A组4例,B组8例,治疗后A组有1例黄疸减轻(6.7%);B组6例黄疸减轻(40%),两组有统计学差异(P<0.05)。CBR有效率A组为53.3%,B组为66.7%。两组3个月生存率为100%,6个月生存率分别为80%和93.3%,1年生存期分别为20%和40%。B组胃肠道反应率高于A组,但统计学无差异P>0.05。结论健择联用HCPT治疗胰腺癌有客观疗效,明显改善病人生存质量,延长生存期且病人耐受性好。
作者 龚德根 郑鸿
出处 《中华腹部疾病杂志》 2003年第8期570-571,共2页 Chinese Journal of Celiopathy
  • 相关文献

同被引文献20

  • 1Burris HA, Moore M J, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15(6):2403-2413.
  • 2Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of report of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary [J].Controlled Clin Trials, 1996, 17:1-12.
  • 3Scheithauer W, Schull B, Ulrich-Pur H, et al. Biweekly highdose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase Ⅱ trial [J]. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14(1) :97-104.
  • 4Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, et al. Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective,randomized phase Ⅲ study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale [J]. Cancer, 2002, 94(4):902-910.
  • 5Gansauge F, Ramadani M, Pressmar J, et al. NSC-631570(Ukrain) in the palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer.Results of a phase Ⅱ trial [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2002,386(8): 570-574.
  • 6Berlin JD, Catalano P, Thomas JP, et al. Phase Ⅲ study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297 [J]. J Clin Oncol,2002, 20(15): 3270-3275.
  • 7Bramhall SR, Schulz J, Nemunaitis J, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer [J]. Br J Cancer, 2002, 87(2): 161-167.
  • 8Van Cutsem E, van de Velde H, Karasek P, et al. Phase ⅢTrial of Gemcitabine Plus Tipifarnib Compared With Gemcitabine Plus Placebo in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J]. JClin Oncol, 2004, 22(8):1430-1438.
  • 9Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. GemOx (gemcitabine+oxaliplatin) versus Gem (gemcitabine) in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Final results of the GERCOR/GISCAD Intergroup Phase Ⅲ [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(14suppl): abstr 4008.
  • 10O'Reilly EM, Abou-Alfa GK, Letourneau R, et al. A randomized phase Ⅲ trial of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate; DX) and gemcitabine (GEM) vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22 (14suppl): abstr 4006.

引证文献1

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部