期刊文献+

论英语情态助动词意义假说及其单义回归 被引量:5

On the Semantics of the English Modals and Its Return to Monosemy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 囿于逻辑一语义表征的英语情态助动词意义假说有着天然的语用欠缺,因此不能对动态的用法作出全面的解释。本文从多义与传统单义假说的内部矛盾入手揭示了这种局限,探讨了以语用的直接介入为标志,在语义、语用结合层面回归单义假说的趋势。新法单义在很大程度上反映了语言哲学于情态语义学的新近认识,其经验运用具有活力与生机。 The self\|sufficiency of the logico\|semantic representation in terms of the English modals is born with a deficiency of pragmatic factors,and is therefore unable to give a sound and satisfactory exposition to the various use of the modals.Probing into the inner contradictions both of the polysemy and traditional monosemy view,this paper sheds light on the tendency of returning to monosemy based on a combination of semantics and pragmatics,and the application of the new method,due to the recent development in the philosophy of language,is full of vitality and proves dynamic.
作者 白世俊
出处 《外语与外语教学》 北大核心 2000年第11期11-14,共4页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 英语情态助动词 多义 传统单义 新法单义 English modals,polysemy,traditional monosemy,new method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Goossens, L. On the development of the modals and of the episternic function in English [A]. Alqvist,A. Papersfrortt the fifth Interrational Conference on Historical Linguistics [ C ]. Amsterdam:John Benjamins. 1982.74 - 84.
  • 2Groefsema, M. Can, may, must and should: A Relevance theoretic account [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1995.31 : 53 - 79 London:CUP.
  • 3Klinge,A. The English modal auxiliaries: from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation [ J ]. Journal of Linguistics, 1993.29 : 315- 357 London: CUP.
  • 4Kratzer,A. The notional eategory of modality [A]. Eikmeyer,H. -J. & Rieser,H. Words, worlds and contexts [C]. Berlin: Walterde Gruyter, 1981. 135 - 158.
  • 5Lakoff,R. The pragmatics of modality [A]. Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting [C]. Chicago Linguistic society: 1972. 229 -247.
  • 6Lascarides,A. & Copestake A. Pragmatics and word meaning [J].Journal of linguistics, 1998.34: 387 - 414 London: CUP.
  • 7Leech. G. & Coates, J. Semantic indeterminacy and the[A]. Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk. Greenbaum S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J [C]. London: Longman.1980.79 - 90.
  • 8Lyons,J. Semantics[A]. New Horizons in Lingyuistics 2. Lyons,J. , Coates,R. ,Deuehar,M. and Gazdar,G [C]. London:Penguin Books. 1987. 152 - 177.
  • 9Palmer,F. Mood and modality [M]. Cambridge:CUP. 1986.
  • 10Tanaka,T. Semantic changes of can and may: differentiation and implication [J]. Journal of Linguistics. 1990.266:89 - 123.

二级参考文献5

共引文献4

同被引文献69

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部