摘要
物权行为理论是德国民法理论的基础,在我国却长期处于被否定的地位。目前在探讨物权法的立法实践中,学者们对我国物权立法是否采取物权行为理论仍存有较大的争议。本文主要论证了物权行为理论的区分原则和无因性原则,认为物权行为独立于债权行为,二者是不同的法律事实,债权行为的无效并不必然导致物权行为的无效。随着物权行为理论的深入研究,其科学性与合理性必将会被我国学者所接受。
The theory of Juristic Act of Real Right is the basis of German civil law ,but it has been negated in China for a long time.Now our property law is around corner and there is still a lot of arguments about this theory. This article talks about its two basic principles to prove that the theory of Juristic Act of Real Right is both theoretically and practically necessary in building and perfecting the law system.
出处
《苏州市职业大学学报》
2003年第4期27-29,共3页
Journal of Suzhou Vocational University
关键词
物权行为
独立性
无因性
juristic act of real right
independent
abstract