摘要
乾嘉汉学治学宗旨是由文字音韵训诂入手以寻求经书义理。但汉学家对这一宗旨的理解并不一致 ,学术实践的途径亦有差异。考察其代表人物戴震、阮元各自的学术主张与学术实践 ,比较二者的同异之处 ,有助于我们进一步理解汉学治学宗旨的科学性与局限性。
The Han-learning School emphasized to approach the meaning of Classic through textual studies. However,different Han-learning scholars applied this principle variously. This article intends to examine the difference between those scholars' academic practice by focusing on Dai Zhen and Ruan Yuan. Dai and Ruan were different in their respective principle and practices. To study their similarity and difference could help us to understand the Han-learning School's success and limits.
出处
《清史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第3期91-98,共8页
The Qing History Journal