期刊文献+

宋代审计三论 被引量:6

ON Audit in Song Dynasty in Its Three Aspects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宋代发明并使用了审计一词,但在审计实践中使用最为广泛的则是与审计密切相关的审磨、磨勘、点检等词语,这说明宋代对审计的界定既较为科学,又不够彻底。宋代在中央和地方设立了较为专门而具体的审计机构,这是审计发展的重要标志,但缺乏真正独立的审计机构及其体系。宋代通过不断的审计实践和立法,逐步形成和完善了审计的反应、制约、奖惩机制,一定程度上保证了审计机构的正常运行,但其作用在不同的时期又是有所区别的。 It was in Song that the term'审计'(audit)was invented,but in the practice of auditing what was the most extensively used were the terms closely related with it,such as '审磨','磨勘',and '点检'.These terms demonstrates that the definition given to audit in Song was either scientific nor thoroughgoing.Special and specific organizations for auditing were established in Song.The function of the latter was quite specific and professional,which was a significant mark of the development of auditing.But these organizations did not constitute a really independent auditing system.Through constant practices and legislation,the Song dy nasty gradually formed and brought to perfection the mechanism for feedback,control,and reward and punishment,and,to a great extent,guaranteed the normal functioning of audit institutes.But the function of audit differed in different periods.
作者 肖建新
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期39-46,共8页 Journal of Historical Science
基金 安徽省教委科研项目(99JW0071)。
关键词 宋代 审计 内涵 机构 机制 Song Dynasty audit connotation organization mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1谢深甫.庆元条法事类[M].北京:燕京大学图书馆藏版,1948.
  • 2徐松.宋会要辑稿·食货[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
  • 3李焘.续资治通鉴长编[M].北京:中华书局标点本,1986..
  • 4肖建新.宋朝审计机构的演变[J].中国史研究,2000(2):112-126. 被引量:13
  • 5徐松.宋会要辑稿·职官[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
  • 6张永康.审计学原理与务实[M].台北:三民书局有限公司,1981.
  • 7章如愚.群书考索(续集)[M].台北;商务印书馆,1983.
  • 8刘昫.旧唐书[M].台北:商务印书馆,1983.
  • 9窦仪.宋刑统[M].北京:中华书局,1984..

二级参考文献2

共引文献148

同被引文献75

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部