期刊文献+

略论程序法与实体法的执法观念定位——兼论执行实体法与程序法的关系 被引量:2

略论程序法与实体法的执法观念定位——兼论执行实体法与程序法的关系
原文传递
导出
摘要 程序法与实体法具有不同的价值和功能 ,二者之间不仅是内容和形式的辩证关系 ,而且程序法在一定情况下亦可弥补实体法的不足。随着法制的完备 ,执法的民主性、科学性、公正性备受重视 ,所以重新评价和认识实体法与程序法的关系 ,重视程序法的价值、功能 ,确立程序法与实体法并重的执法观念 ,应引起法学界、法律界足够的关注和重视。 Procedural law and substantive law have different values and functions. The two laws are in the relation of subject and form, and procedural law can make up the deficiency of substantive law as well. With the perfection of rule of law, much more attention has been attached to the democratic, scientific and just enforcement of laws, so reevaluating and recognizing the relationship between substantive law and procedural law, emphasizing the value and functions of procedural law, and establishing the law enforcement notion that procedural law and substantive law are both important should arouse enough attention and emphasis in the jurisprudential circle and legal profession.
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第5期100-105,共6页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 程序法 实体法 执法观念 Procedural Law Substantive Law Law Enforcement Notion
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1杨联华.简论英国注重程序法的缘由[J].比较法研究,1991,5(4):47-49. 被引量:11
  • 2John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 3Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 4Gunther Teubner."Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law"Law and Society Review,1983.
  • 5MilsomSF.
  • 6Michael D.Bayles.Procedural Justice, Allocating to Individuals,1990.
  • 7J.Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action,1987.
  • 8O. F. Robinsom and others.An Introduction to European Legal History,1985.
  • 9A. Engelmann and others.A History of Continental Civil Procedure,1927.
  • 10Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.

共引文献860

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部