摘要
简要分析比较前一行为说、后一行为说、具体分析说之后 ,通过案例的分析 ,得出赞同前一行为说的结论 :复行为犯中 ,数实行行为都是构成行为的一部分 ,开始实施了前一实行行为 ,尽管未实施后一行为也等于开始实施了构成行为 ;与此同时 ,行为人的前一行为已经有导致危害结果发生的现实危险性 ,否则 ,刑法规范就没有必要给予前一行为“构成要件要素”这样高度的评价 ,而只需采取单一实行行为的规定方式 ;而且行为人主观上的直接犯罪目的业已确定无疑地在前一行为中得到充分表现。
After analyzing and comparing first action theory,last action theory and concrete analysis theory,I appreciate first action theory.Several action within complex action guilt are all the parts of action,though not executing last action,executing the first action amount to execute constitution action.At the same time,the first action of subject has leaded to hazards result,or it is unnecessary in criminal regulation to generate the first action such high evaluation as constitution elements,but only take sole regulated model of executive action.And objective direct criminal intention of subject have make full paly in first action.
出处
《法学论坛》
2002年第6期35-37,共3页
Legal Forum
关键词
复行为犯
前一行为
后一行为
complex action guilt
first action
last action