期刊文献+

松嫩平原两种覆被盐渍化特征的时空变化研究 被引量:5

Study on Spatial and Temporal Changes of Saline Characters of Two Vegetation Covers in Songnen Plain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对2003年6~10月羊草草地和大豆地的盐渍化特征(含水量、pH值和含盐量)的动态变化进行分析,并对比2种土地覆被类型之间的变化差异,结果发现:羊草草地和大豆地含水量变化与采样区降雨量的变化有相同趋势,但在采样初期和末期,大豆地含水量要大于羊草草地;对于pH值和含盐量,在土壤剖面0~60 cm,两种覆被类型不同层次动态变化一致,大豆地变化的一致性可达到更深层次,但是其峰值要比羊草草地滞后20天左右出现,同时2种土地覆被类型pH值和含盐量的峰值均滞后于含水量的峰值。单因素方差分析表明采样期内2种土地覆被含水量在剖面40~80 cm差异显著,而pH值则是在整个剖面都有显著差异,含盐量在20~60 cm剖面深度差异显著。2种覆被类型各个剖面深度10月17日的pH值、含水量比6月7日有所上升,含盐量则刚好相反。 Through analyzing the dynamic changes of saline characters in Aneurolepidium chinense field and soy- bean field from June to October in 2003, comparing their differences in water content, pH and salt content , and results are as followings: (1 ) water contents in aneurolepidium chinense field and soybean field have the same ten- dency with the rainfall in these fields, however, at the beginning and the end of the sampling, the water content in the soybean field is more than that in the aneurolepidium chinense field, (2) the pH and salt content have the same dynamic change at 0~60 cm soil depth in the two vegetation covers, and in the soybean field, this consis- tency reachs to deeper level. But their peak values in the soybean field are 20 days behind that in the aneurolepidi- um chinense field. At the same time, the peak values of pH and salt content in the two vegetation covers all lag rainfall's, (3) analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that water content, pH value and salt content significantly change respectively at 40~80 cm, the whole depth and 20~60 cm. The pH value and water content at the end of sampling(17, Oct. ) are higher than that at the begin (7, Jun. ), however, salt content reversely changes.
出处 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期108-111,共4页 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程学科前沿领域项目(KZCX3-SW-NA-18)资助 中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX1-Y-04-01)
关键词 松嫩平原 覆被类型 盐渍化特征 时空变化 aneurolepidium chinense field soybean field water content salt content pH value
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1郑慧滢 李建东.松嫩平原盐生植物与盐碱化草地的恢复[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.180-188.
  • 2Allen E B. Temporal and spatial organization of desert plant communities[A]. Skujins J (Ed.),Semiarid Lands and Deserts[M]. Marcel Dekker,New York:1991. 193-208.
  • 3Singh N T,Dagar J C,Singh G. Conservation of soils against waterlogging and salinization and salinization[J]. Indian J. Soil conserve, 1994,22 : 112 - 124.
  • 4Read D B,Bengough A G,Gregory P J,et al. Plant roots release phospholipid surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil[J]. New Phytologis, 2003,157 : 315 - 326.
  • 5Fatma M, Ghaly. Role of natural vegetation in improving salt affected soil in northern Egypt [J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2002,64: 173- 178.
  • 6Qadir M,Ghafoor A,Murtaza G. Use of saline-sodic waters through phytoremediation of calcareous saline-sodic soils[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2001,50:197- 210.
  • 7Batra L,Kumar A,Manna M C,et al. Microbiological and chemical amelioration of alkaline soil by growing Karnal grass and gypsum application[J]. Exp. Agric. , 1997,33: 389- 397.
  • 8张为政,张宝田.羊草草原割草强度与土壤盐渍化的关系[J].中国草地,1993,15(4):4-8. 被引量:15
  • 9张为政.松嫩平原羊草草地植被退化与土壤盐渍化的关系[J].植物生态学报,1994,18(1):50-55. 被引量:45
  • 10张为政,高琼.松嫩平原羊草草地土壤水盐运动规律的研究[J].植物生态学报,1994,18(2):132-139. 被引量:20

二级参考文献22

  • 1张为政,高琼.松嫩平原羊草草地土壤水盐运动规律的研究[J].植物生态学报,1994,18(2):132-139. 被引量:20
  • 2郭继勋.枯枝落叶对草原生态环境的影响[J].中国草地,1989(6):17-20. 被引量:14
  • 3刘昌明 洪嘉琏 等.农田蒸散量的计算.农田蒸发-测定与计算[M].北京:气象出版社,1991.34-142.
  • 4郑慧莹 李建东.松嫩平原盐生植物与盐碱化草地的恢复[M].北京:科学出版社,1999..
  • 5李建东,植物学报,1988年,30卷,4期,420页
  • 6刘孝义,1978年
  • 7李博,普通生态学,1990年
  • 8王伯荪,植物群落学,1987年
  • 9俞仁培,土壤碱化及其防治,1984年
  • 10团体著者,中国土壤,1978年

共引文献115

同被引文献109

引证文献5

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部