摘要
With the coming into force of “ overall economic cooperation frame agreement of China and Association of South-east Asian Nations (CAFTA) ” , the tendency of constructing CAFTA investment rules is inevitable. It has three routes to construct mainly. It is the most suitable route to transplant the investment rules of Association of South-east Asian Nations and consult the investment rules of WTO and other regional economic organizations. It should conclude the transnational direct investment in the area (including service trade field). Investment treatment abides by the most-favored-nation treatment principle, but some fields can implement conditional national treatment. Member states at equality and mutual benefit, try to make a detailed and justice investment dispute-solved rules with consensus.
With the coming into force of “ overall economic cooperation frame agreement of China and Association of South-east Asian Nations (CAFTA) ” , the tendency of constructing CAFTA investment rules is inevitable. It has three routes to construct mainly. It is the most suitable route to transplant the investment rules of Association of South-east Asian Nations and consult the investment rules of WTO and other regional economic organizations. It should conclude the transnational direct investment in the area (including service trade field). Investment treatment abides by the most-favored-nation treatment principle, but some fields can implement conditional national treatment. Member states at equality and mutual benefit, try to make a detailed and justice investment dispute-solved rules with consensus.
出处
《东南亚纵横》
北大核心
2004年第11期50-54,共5页
Crossroads：Southeast Asian Studies
