期刊文献+

道势相依:关于书院制度盛衰循环内在脉络的探讨

Interdependence Between Tao and Power: An Analysis on the Interent Rule in the Circle of Ups and Downs of the System of Academy of Classical Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 书院教育制度作为中国教育史上的一朵奇葩 ,其发展经历了几度盛衰循环 ,体现出“以道抗势”与“以道附势”的双重性格。表面上看 ,“以道抗势”体现出“道”“势”的矛盾冲突 ,但实质上 ,由于“以道抗势”蕴涵的“道”“势”对立并不是“势”与“非势”的对立 ,而是此“势”与彼“势”的对立 ,即书院所倡导的理想之“势”与现实之“势”的对立 ,因此 ,“道”“势”是内在相依且可以转化的。“道”“势”相依既构成书院制度发展的内在脉络 。 As an unusual phenomenon in the history of Chinese higher education, the system of academy of classical learning developed in the circle process of ups and downs, and embodied the double characteristic what is that Tao's resistance to Power and Tao's dependent on Power. It seems that there is conflict between Tao and Power. However, the central point at issue is that Tao is opposite to Power is not confrontation between Power and Non-power but confrontation between this Power and that Power. There was interdependent between Tao and Power, and they could change from each other. The inner identity of the system of academy of classical learning is that Tao couldn't be separated from Power, and that is the crux of the system of academy of classical learning couldn't get rid of the adjunct character.
作者 雷晓云
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 2004年第6期119-122,共4页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
关键词 书院制度 道势 依附性 the system of academy of classical learning Tao Power inner identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]李国均.中国书院史[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,1994.
  • 2[2]中国教育大系编撰委员会.历代教育制度考[C].武汉:湖北教育出版社,1994.
  • 3柳诒徵.中国文化史[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001..
  • 4[4]邓洪波.中国书院学规[C].长沙:湖南大学出版社,2000.
  • 5[6]葛兆光.七世纪至十九世纪中国的知识、思想与信仰世界(第二卷)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部