关于"高饶事件"几个问题的再探讨

Also on the Social and Historical Backgrounds of the "Gao - Rao Incident"And the Start of the Party Realizing and Disclosing it

"高饶事件"的发生固然有个人的主观因素,但在大解放区基础上产生的大区行政建制和国家行政管理体制中的"两级制",为"高饶事件"的出现留下了体制上的空间。认为"'东北一党员'的来信是认识和揭露高、饶问题的起点"的观点,缺乏史实论证,也与此后高岗的被重用相矛盾。弄清揭露高、饶分裂党的阴谋的时间是必要的,但"识破"与"揭露"高、饶的问题实际上并没有截然分开。认为"高、饶问题暴露后,中央对他们的问题没有上纲到路线斗争的高度",与历史事实不符。

Except for the individual factors, the 'Gao - Rao incident' had its institutional reasons. While this incident broke out, there were two levels of administrative system, the first one was the national system of administration and management, the second was the big administrative region based on the big liberated area. This 'two levels of administrative system' supplied the institutional room for the incident. The viewpoint, which thinks the ' letter from one party member in northeast China' is the starting point of realizing and disclosing the incident, is scare of argumentation with historical facts. It is necessary to make clear the time of disclosing the incident, but it needs to separate ' see through' with 'disclose' . The viewpoint, which thinks that the central government did not deal with the matter on the top level, is not in accordance with history.