期刊文献+

戴震与江永关系的再探讨 被引量:1

Re-probing into the True Relationship between DAI Zhen and JIANG Yong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关于戴震与江永间之究竟关系,学界多从钱穆及其高足余英时之说。然钱说在两个重要方面有误一、谓戴震的朴学出自江永;二、谓江、戴二人初晤时间为乾隆十五年庚午(1750年)。其后,余英时虽对其师之前说进行了修正,即江、戴二人为师友关系,然仍坚持其师之后说。本文参校有关史料指出不仅江、戴二人初晤时间实为庚午之二年后的壬申(1752年),且其二人之关系最多亦仅能处于师友之间,故所谓的戴氏背师之说实乃无中生有。 On the true relationship between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong, the academic agree usually with the viewpoints advanced by Qian Mu and his famous disciple Yu Ying-shi.However,there are two important mistakes in Qian's point of view:firstly,Dai Zhen's Pu-xue comes from Jiang Yong.secondly,the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong is in 1750.Afterward,Yu Ying-shi corrects partially his master's viewpoints,he thinks that the relationship between Jiang Yong and Dai zhen is the teather-friend and agrees to the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong advanced by his master.Based on historical materials involved,this paper points out that not only the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong is in 1752,but also the true relationship between them is not better than teacher-friend,so the standpoint that Dai Zhen betrays his master is inexistent.
作者 陈徽
出处 《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第6期102-106,共5页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
关键词 戴震 江永 朴学 哲学思想 师友关系 史料 DAI Dong-yuan JIANG Shen-xiu the True Relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1[2]钱穆.中国现代学术经典·钱宾四卷(上册)[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1999.

同被引文献62

  • 1杨应芹.戴震与江永[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1995,19(4):35-40. 被引量:3
  • 2漆永祥.新发现戴震《江慎修先生七十寿序》佚文一篇[J].中国典籍与文化,2005(1):122-123. 被引量:10
  • 3戴震.《江慎修先生事略状》,《戴震文集》卷12,中华书局1980年版,第182、181页
  • 4《戴先生行状》,《碑传集》卷50.
  • 5洪榜.《戴先生行状》[A]..《戴震全集》第6册[C].,.第3380页.
  • 6.《戴震文集》[M].中华书局,1980年版..
  • 7《论戴震与章学诚》.三联书店2000年版,第95页.
  • 8《考工记图》卷上.
  • 9《戴东原先生年谱》,《戴震文集》,第227页.
  • 10姚氏《国朝诸名人赞》,南开大学古籍与文化研究所编:《清文海》第67册,北京:国家图书馆出版社,2010年,第637-638页.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部