摘要
关于戴震与江永间之究竟关系,学界多从钱穆及其高足余英时之说。然钱说在两个重要方面有误一、谓戴震的朴学出自江永;二、谓江、戴二人初晤时间为乾隆十五年庚午(1750年)。其后,余英时虽对其师之前说进行了修正,即江、戴二人为师友关系,然仍坚持其师之后说。本文参校有关史料指出不仅江、戴二人初晤时间实为庚午之二年后的壬申(1752年),且其二人之关系最多亦仅能处于师友之间,故所谓的戴氏背师之说实乃无中生有。
On the true relationship between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong, the academic agree usually with the viewpoints advanced by Qian Mu and his famous disciple Yu Ying-shi.However,there are two important mistakes in Qian's point of view:firstly,Dai Zhen's Pu-xue comes from Jiang Yong.secondly,the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong is in 1750.Afterward,Yu Ying-shi corrects partially his master's viewpoints,he thinks that the relationship between Jiang Yong and Dai zhen is the teather-friend and agrees to the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong advanced by his master.Based on historical materials involved,this paper points out that not only the time of first contact between Dai Zhen and Jiang Yong is in 1752,but also the true relationship between them is not better than teacher-friend,so the standpoint that Dai Zhen betrays his master is inexistent.
出处
《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2004年第6期102-106,共5页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.