期刊文献+

清朝风闻监察述论 被引量:2

A Brief Discussion of Hearsay Supervision in Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清朝统治者既鼓励风闻,又侵蚀或破坏言者的风闻权,从而使风闻运作陷入深深的矛盾之中,其历史局限性显而易见。但风闻毕竟是纠察奸邪、肃清纲纪的有力手段,且风闻并非风闻即劾,亦非风闻惩处,风闻后尚需取证核实,方能正式弹劾。科道官奏弹不当亦有法律约束,因而风闻所引起的弹劾权滥用的负面作用是有限的。 The governors in Qing Dynasty both encouraged the hearsay and eroded or destroyed the speaker's right of hearsay. Therefore, the hearsay was deeply involved in the contradictory. The hearsay is after all a forceful means to supervise the evil and clean up the disciplines. The hearsay doesn't mean to impeach only by learning through hearsay and it need get proofs to impeach officials after learning through hearsay. If the professional officials don't impeach properly, they may get the punishment of law. So the side-effect caused by the abuse of the rights of impeachment through hearsay is limited.
作者 刘长江
出处 《临沂师范学院学报》 2004年第5期27-31,共5页 Journal of Linyi Teachers' College
关键词 清朝 科道官 风闻监察 皇权 弹劾权 Qing Dynasty professional officials supervision of hearsay, imperial right
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1陈宝良.论明代的科道[J]中州学刊,1992(05).
  • 2(唐)杜 佑撰,王文锦等.通典[M]中华书局,1988.
  • 3中国第一历史档案馆.康熙起居注[M]中华书局,1984.
  • 4王钟翰.清史列传[M]中华书局.

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部