期刊文献+

也谈交通肇事责任判断的标准——与彭剑鸣、江水玲先生商榷

On the Criteria of Liabilities in Causing Traffic Trouble
下载PDF
导出
摘要 交通肇事责任的判定,行政规章和<刑法>都是强调因果关系,并无不同之处,两者相互承接.路权是一个学术概念而不是法律概念;路权原则与安全原则构成一个相对完整的责任判定体系,因此路权不应与其他责任判定体系内的判定原则并提. Both administrative regulations and 'Criminal Law' emphasize on the causality in judgement of liabilities in causing traffic trouble. Rights of road is an academic concept, rather than a legal concept. Besides, principle of rights of road and security principle form a relatively complete system of liabilities' judgment, therefore, rights of road can't be emerged with the judgement principles in other systems of liabilities' judgment.
作者 周继烈
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2002年第3期83-84,共2页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词 交通肇事 责任判定标准 路权 traffic trouble criteria of liabilities rights of road
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部