语言哲学视野下的庄子和德里达之比较

Comparison Between Zhuangzi and Deleda in Terms of Linguistic Philosophy

庄子与德里达作为东西方与主流文化相背的两大异质文化的代表 ,对于东西方文化精神和文化发展走向产生了深远的影响。庄子和德里达的哲学思想、文化精神在反传统的立场、解构二元对立的思辨策略、语言认识的差别及对终极理性和真理的态度等方面存在着很大的差异 ,庄子和德里达同在表层 ,异在本质。德里达及其解构主义是彻底的真理和理性的颠覆者 ,而庄子及其道家哲学则是真理和理性的探寻者和捍卫者。

In this paper, the philosophical ideas and cultural spirits of Zhuangzi and Deleda are compared from four aspects: (1)anti-tradition position; (2)dialectical dualism; (3)the difference in conception of language; (4)the attitude towards the ultimate rationality and truth.This analysis suggests that Zhuangzi and Deledas theories, though seemingly similar, actually differ essentially. Deleda is a consistent critic of truth and rationality, while Zhuangzi is a constant inquirer and defender of truth and rationality.