2Appleby, Paul. Government it ditterent ( 1945 ). Classics of Public Administration. Jay M. Shafritz & Albert C.Hyde (eds.). Hartcourt Brace College Publishers. Fort Worth : Texas. 1997.
3Bailey, Mary Timney. Minnowbrook Ⅱ: An End or a New Beginning?Public Administrative Review,vol. 49.March/April 1989 ,p. 226- 7.
4Dye, Thomas R. &Hurley, Thomas L. The Responsiveness of Federal and State Governments to Urban Problems. Journal of Politics. Fall 1978,v. 40: 196-207.
5Cleary, Robert E. Dialogue, Negotiation and the Advancement of Democracy:Reflections on Minnowbrook Ⅱ. Public Administration Review. March/April 1989,v. 49:226-7.
6Frederickson, H. George. Minnowbrook Ⅱ: Changing Epochs of Public Administration. Public Administrative Review,vol. 49. March/April 1989,p. 95-100.
7Frederickson, H. George. Toward a New Public Administ ration (1971 ). Classics of Public Administration.Hartcourt Brace College Publishers. Fort Worth:Texas. 1997.
8Friedman,Robert S. Representation in Regulatory Decision Making : Scientific, Industrial, and Customer Inputs to the FDA. Public Administration Review. May/June 1978,p. 205-213.
9Gormley, william, Hoadley, John 8t williams, Charles.Potential Responsiveness in the Bureaucracy :Views of Public Utility Regulation. American Political Science Review,vol. 77,1983,p. 703-716.
10Guy, Mary E. Minnowbrook Ⅱ: Conclusions. Public Administrative Review, vol. 49. March/April 1989, p.219-20.
