期刊文献+

社会认知偏离量表编制及其军队青年常模 被引量:5

Development of social cognition bias scale and military youth norm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :使用社会认知信息加工理论来评估行为和心理偏离 .方法 :适应不良行为如攻击和抑郁等是通过心理加工———行为反应联结构成的 ,并与特定的知识结构有关 .按照“品行障碍和抑郁的发展模型” ,行为偏离与早期经验、知识结构和社会信息加工相联系 .依据这一模型编制了 5 1题的社会认知偏离问卷评估攻击、抑郁和焦虑 .116 0 6名中国军事人员完成了评定 ,收回有效答卷 10 891,有效率是 93 8% .结果 :问卷的α信度系数为 0 81,其与中国人个性评定量表相应分量表的校标关联效度均在 0 6 6以上 .该问卷的区分效度显示高分组在加工两半球协同任务时其速度和精确度均低于对照组 .结论 :该问卷作为青年军人常模具有一定的信度和效度 . AIM: To evaluate the behavioral and psychological deviation by using social cognitive processing theory. MATHODS: Some maladaptive social behaviors, such as aggression and depression, were formed through mental process behavioral response linkages and were related to special knowledge structures. According to “Models of the development of conduct disorder and depression”(Dodge, 1993), deviant behaviors were associated with different parts of the early experiences, knowledge structures and the ways of social information processing. Based on this model, a 51-itemed of Social Cognition Bias Scale was developed to measure aggression, depression and anxiety and 11606 Chinese military youth were tested with the scale. RESULTS: The reliability Coefficient α of the scale was .81. Its criterion-related validity with Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory subscales was over 0.66. The discriminant validation revealed that high score group showed decreased speed and accuracy in processing interhemispheric cooperative tasks compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Our 51-itemed of Social Cognition Bias Scale has good reliability and validity for this large sample in setting military youth norms.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2004年第22期2031-2034,共4页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
基金 全军医学科学技术研究"十五"计划基金重点课题项目(0 1Z0 0 5)
关键词 认知 偏离 异常心理评估 常模 可重复性 结果 cognition bias psychopathological Assessment norm Reproducibility of Results
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1L.A.珀文著,周榕等译.人格科学[M].上海: 华东师范大学出版社,2001: 405-418.
  • 2Dodge, K.A.(1993). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the development of conduct disorder and depression[J]. Ann Review Psychol, 1993; 44: 559-584.
  • 3张倩,郭念锋.攻击行为儿童大脑半球某些认知特点的研究[J].心理学报,1999,31(1):104-110. 被引量:22
  • 4宋维真,张建新,张建平,张妙清,梁觉.编制中国人个性测量表(CPAI)的意义与程序[J].心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407. 被引量:52
  • 5Funder , David C. Personality[J]. Ann Review Psychol, 2001; 52:197-221.
  • 6Dodge KA,Lansford JE,Burks VS,et al. Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children[J]. Child Dev, 2003 ; 74(2): 374-393.
  • 7Dodge K A,Laird R,Lochman JE,et al. Multidimensional latent-construct analysis of children's social information processing patterns: Correlations with aggressive behavior problems[J]. Psychol Assess, 2002; 14(1): 60-73.
  • 8Yoon J,Hughes J,Gaur A,et al. Social cognition in aggressive children: A metaanalytic review[J]. Cognit Behav Practice, 1999 ; 6(4): 320-331.
  • 9Wood CN,Gross AM. Behavioral response generation and selection of rejected-reactive aggressive. rejected-nonaggressive and average status children[J]. Child Family Behavior Ther, 2002;24(3): 1-19.

二级参考文献11

  • 1宋维真.中国人使用明尼苏达多相个性测验表的结果分析[J].心理学报,1985,17(4):346-355. 被引量:96
  • 2Guo Nianfeng,Int Sympo Cognitive Processes of the Chinese Language,1997年
  • 3李晓雯,心理学报,1996年,28卷,2期,215页
  • 4郭念锋,心理学报,1993年,25卷,2期,180页
  • 5郭念锋,神经科学纲要,1993年,738页
  • 6王--,认知心理学,1992年,41页
  • 7朱智贤,心理学大词典,1989年,641页
  • 8李心天,中华神经精神科杂志,1988年,21卷,4期,196页
  • 9Guo Nianfeng,Chinese Language Psychology,1983年,1页
  • 10曹日昌(译),实验心理学,1965年,201页

共引文献73

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部