期刊文献+

两种不同工艺制备的大豆分离蛋白功能特性的比较 被引量:3

THE EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF SOY PROTEIN ISOLATE PREPARED BY TWO DIFFERENT METHODS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用超滤法和碱溶酸沉法分别制备不同的大豆分离蛋白,并研究它们在功能特性上的差异.结果表明,与碱溶酸沉法制备的SPI相比,超滤法制备的SPI的乳化性、溶解性及发泡性有明显提高,但凝胶性较差.在一定pH范围内,碱溶酸沉法制备的SPI的泡沫稳定性比超滤法制备的SPI的要好. Different kinds of SPI were prepared by ultrafiltration(UF) and acid precipitation respectively and the functional properties were studied.The results indicate that emulsification, solubility and foaming properties of UF SPI are improved obviously compared with acid precipitated SPI. However, the acid precipitated SPI has a better gelation property. In a certain pH, the precipitated SPI also has better foaming stability than its UF counterparts.
出处 《郑州工程学院学报》 北大核心 2004年第4期16-19,27,共5页
基金 河南省科技攻关项目(001160503)
关键词 碱溶酸沉法 大豆分离蛋白 功能特性 超滤法 凝胶性 乳化性 泡沫稳定性 制备 工艺 发泡性 soya protein isolate ultrafiltration acid precipitation functional properties
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Omosaiye O, Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration of soy bean water extracts: processing characteristics and yield [ J ]. J Food Sci, 1979, 44: 1027 - 1031.
  • 2David W, Deeslie A. Fractionation of soy protein hydrolysates using ultrafiltration membranes[J]. J Food Sci, 1991,57:411 - 413.
  • 3Rao A,Shallo H E,Ericson H E,et al. Characterization of soy protein concentrate produced by membrane ultrafiltration [ J ]. J Food Sci, 2002, 67:1412 - 1418.
  • 4Brooks J R, Morr C V. Current aspects of soy protein fractionation and nomenclature [ J ]. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 1985,62,1347 -1354.

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部