理性语言批判——对“美是什么”的反思

The Criticism of Rational Language --The Thought about what Is the Beauty

人类理性语言是呈“递阶秩序”的结构 ,所谓最高概念都是假定的 ,是在无可奈何的情况下制定的。如果我们一定要用一种肯定的方式来回答 ,那就只能是绝对无或者“真空”。而所谓“中介性”概念 ,我们通常的解释和定义 ,其实都是近似值。所谓“是”或者“有”其实都是“不全是”或者“不全有”。表语永远无法和主语相符合或者相一致。此外 ,“这是什么”“那是什么”乃是一种“不知之问” ,而像“美是什么”“艺术是什么”等问法 ,其实是“明知故问”。柏拉图的“美是什么”的命题 ,其答案就是“美本身” ,而几千年来 ,与其说这种提问是一种误导 ,还不如说是后人对他的误解。

The writer think that the man Rational language is the configuration like stairs. so-called the highest conception is all assumed, and it is draw up under the conditions without away . If we must answer in a affirmative way, it doesn't exist or it is vacuum. So-called 'the middle conception', our common explanation and definition are all similar in fact. So-called'being' or 'having' is 'not completely being' or 'not completely having'. Predicative is not the same as subject for ever, or similar. Besides this the writer yet think: 'what is this'. 'What is that' is a kind of 'asking what he doesn't know', but the asking about 'what is the Beauty'? 'What is the Art' is 'asking what he knows' . The proposition about 'what is the Beauty' of Plato, the key is beauty itself, but several millenary later, rather than say this kind of formulation is wrong, I prefer to say it is the descendants misread about it.