今用历谱与《史记》汉初历日不合例证举隅

EXAMPLES OF UNCONFORMITY BETWEEN MODERN CHRONICLES AND CALENDAR MONTH, DAY AND THE HEAVENLY STEMS AND EARTHLY BRANCHES IN THE EARLY DAYS OF HAN DYNASTY

我们考察汉初120年《史记》中历日的记载,发现有37处与《二十史朔闰表》、《三千五百年历日天象》等今用历谱不合,本文以时为序将其列出。汉初120年也是司马迁去世前的120年,涵盖了他的一生和生前约六十年,《史记》的纪年理应可靠。文中揭发出的矛盾应当得到历史、历法界的解释。

While making a study of the records of calendar month, day and the heavenly stems and earthly branches of 120 years in Shi Ji (Historical Records) in the early days of Han Dynasty, we have discovered that 37 calendar month, day and the heavenly stems and earthly branches are not conformed to modern chronicles, such as Er Shi Shi Shuo Run Biao (the Chinese Calendars of Twenty Histories), San Qian Wu Bai Nian Li Ri Tian Xiang (Astronomical Phenomena of Calendar Month, Day and the Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches in 3,500 Years). The authors list them in time order. Those 120 years in the early days of Han Dynasty is the ones before Si Maqian died, including his lifetime and approximately 60 years before he was born. The records of Shi Ji should be reliable. So all that has been discovered shonld be explained by history and calendrical system.