期刊文献+

枢椎侧方椎弓的临床解剖学测量 被引量:7

Clinical anatomic study of lateral arch of axis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨国人行枢椎椎弓根螺钉内固定的可行性。方法:测量57例干燥枢椎标本侧弓前部内倾角α s、上倾角Y、上宽Ws、中宽Wm、下宽W、上高Hup下高Hip及上关节突厚度Hsa,Ebraheim进针点O距下关节突外缘和下缘距离Lla和Hia钉道表观长度Ls、实际长度La,O点距上关节突后缘和峡部的距离Los和Loi。结果:左/右αs=37.78°±7.87°/40.23°±7.73°,y=62.92°±9.25°/62.41°±8.41°,Ws=7.40±1.69 mm/6.86±1.71 mm,Wm=5.18±1.48 mm/5.17±1.40 mm,Wi=4.17±1.13 mm/4.21±0.98 mm.Hsa2+07±0.94 mm/1.97±0.87 mm,Hup=5 09±1.39 mm/5.00±1.43 mm,Hip=6.05±1.48 m/5.84±1.20 mm.Lla=4.19±1.17 mm/3.94±1.06 mm,Hia=9.38±1.60 mm/9.44±1.82 mm,Ls=29.43±2.61 mm/30.02±2.70 mm,La=26.63±2.37 mm/26.42±2.72 mm,Los=6.37±1.48 mm/4.96±1.54 mm,Loi=4.42±1.30 mm/2.64±1.25 mm。左右侧分别有45.6%(26)/47.3%(27)例的Wm≤5.0 mm(3.5 mm螺钉的安全界限)。如以仅α作为进针方向,左、右侧分别有63.2%(36)、70.2%(40)的螺钉将进入对侧。结论:国人Wm偏小,3.5 mm椎弓根螺钉内固定风险较大。Ebraheim进针点偏前、偏内、偏上,进钉的内倾角偏大、上倾角偏小。应行调整。 objective: To assess the feasibility of pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of Hangman's fracture based on the anatomical observation and measurement of lateral arch of axis. Methods: Medial inclination of anterior portion(α s) and posterior portion (βs) of lateral arch (separated from posterior portion (isthmus) by transverse process)from superior aspect, and superior inclination of anterior portion(Y ) and posterior portion(5 ) of lateral arch from lateral aspect of 57 dry axes were measured respectively. The superior, middle and inferior width of anterior portion of lateral arch (Wu,Wm and Wi), thickness of superior articular process (Hsa), superior and inferior height of anterior portion of lateral arch (Hup and Hip), horizontal distance from Ebraheim's entrance point(O) to lateral edge of inferior articular process (Lla), posterior edge of superior articular process (Los) and mid-position of isthmus (Loi) on superior aspect, and vertical distance from O to inferior edge of inferior articular process (Hia) on lateral aspect was documented respectively. The apparent and actual pedicle screw length projection (Ls and La) on horizontal plane was also measured. Results: Left/Right αs=37.78°±7.87° /40.23°±7.73°,βs = 6.46°±4.82°/5.20°±2.92°, 7=62.92°±9.25°/62.4°1±8.41°, 8=62.92°±9.25°/62.41°±8.41°.Ws=7.40±1.69 mm/6.86±1.71 mm, Wm=5.18±1.48 mm/5.17±1.40 mm. Wm in 26 (45.61% )left and 27 (47.37% )right side was less than 5.00 mm. Wi=4.17±1.13 mm/ 4.21 ±0.98 mm, Hsa= 2.07±0.94 mm/1.97±0.87 mm, Hup=5.09±1.39 mm/5.00±1.43 mm,Hip=6.05±1.4 mm/5.84±1.20 mm, Lla=4.19±1.17 mm /3.94±1.06 mm, Los= 6.37±1.48 /4.96±1.54, Loi=4.42±1.30 /2.64±1.25 Hia= 9.38±1.60 mm /9.44±1.82 mm,Ls=29.43±2.61 /30.02±2.70,La= 26.63±2.37/26.42±2.72.(left/right). If set a s as medial inclination of pedicle screw insertion, 63.2 % (36) left screws and 70.2 % (40) right ones would penetrate into the corresponding half portion of anterior structure of axis before they reached the anterior surface, if set p s as medial inclination of pedicle screw insertion ,all screws would penetrate into the transverse foramen, and if set Y as superior angle for pedicle screw insertion, all would violate the superior facet of axis. Conclusions: Neither medial nor superior inclination provided by any portion -of the lateral arch could guarantee safe and applicable pedicle screw insertion, the entrance point determined by standard medial and superior inclination of anterior portion of lateral arch for screw insertion was too closer to the lateral edge of inferior articular process and the middle portion of the isthmus. If set 5.0mm width of middle part of anterior portion of lateral arch as technically difficult limit for 3.5mm screw insertion,45.6 % (26) left and 47.4 % (27) right lateral arches are not suitable.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期578-582,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
关键词 枢椎 峡部 侧弓 椎弓根螺钉 axis isthmus lateral arch anatomy pedicle screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Borne GM, Bedou GL, Pindaudeau M. Treatment ofpedicular fractures of the axis. A clinical study and screw fixation technique [J]. J Neurosurgery, 1984, 60(1):88~93.
  • 2Ebraheim NA, Fow J, Xu R, et al. The location of the pedicle and pars interarticularis in the axis[J]. Spine, 2001,26(4): E34~37.
  • 3Choi WG, Vishteh AG, Baskin JJ, et al. Completely dislocated hangman's fracture with a locked C2-3 facet. Case report [J].J Neurosurg, 1997,87 (5):757~760.
  • 4Verheggen R, Jansen J. Hangman's fracture: arguments in favor of surgical therapy for type Ⅱ and Ⅲ according to Edwards and Levine[J].Surg Neurol, 1998,49(3):253~261.
  • 5Ebraheim NA,Rolins JR, Xu RM, et al. Anatomical consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement[J].Spine, 1996,21 (6):691 ~ 695.
  • 6Vieweg U, Meyer B, Schramm J. Differential treatment in acute upper cervical spine injuries: a critical review of a single-institution series[J]. Surg Neurol,2000,54(3):203~211.
  • 7Junge A, El-Sheik M, Celik I, et al. Pathomorphology, diagnosis and treatment of "hangman's fractures" [J]. Unfallchirurg, 2002, 105(9): 775~782.
  • 8Verheggen R, Jansen J. Hangman's fracture: arguments in favor of surgical therapy for type Ⅱ and Ⅲ according to Edwards and Levine[J].Surg Neurol, 1998,49(3):253~261.
  • 9梁裕,龚耀成,郑涛,曹鹏,吴文坚,陈毓,张炅.第2、3颈椎后路钢板螺钉内固定治疗Hangman骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(1):35-37. 被引量:16
  • 10Xu RM, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA, et al. Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle aixs[J].Spine, 1995,20(3):259~263.

二级参考文献14

  • 1高雨仁,杨桂姣,阎八一,马迅,马景昆,张建中.颈椎后路关节突-椎弓根联合内固定的解剖学基础[J].解剖学杂志,1994,17(6):477-480. 被引量:14
  • 2章庆峻.上颈椎不稳外科治疗的进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1996,3(3):212-214. 被引量:7
  • 3[4]Ebraheim N, Rollins JR, Xu R,et al.Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement[J]. Spine, 1996, 21: 691-695
  • 4[5]Mandel IM, Kambach BJ, Petersilge CA,et al.Morphologic considerations of C2 isthmus dimensions for the placement of transarticular screws[J]. Spine, 2000, 25:1542-1547
  • 5[6]An HS. Cervical spinal trauma[J]. Spine, 1998, 23: 2713-2719
  • 6[7]Vieweg U, Meyer B, Schramm J. Differential treatment in acute upper cervical spine injuries: critical review of a single institution series[J]. Surg Neurol, 2000, 54: 203-211
  • 7[8]Farey ID, Nadkarni S, Smith N. Modified Gallie technique versus transarticular screw fixation in C1~2 fusion[J]. Clin Orthop, 1999, 359: 126-135
  • 8[9]Henriques T, Cunningham BW, Olerud C,et al. Biomechanical comparison of five different atlantoaxial posterior fixation techniques[J]. Spine, 2000, 25: 2877-2883
  • 9[10]Naderi S, Crawford NR, Song GS,et al. Biomechanical comparison of C1~2 posterior fixations: Cable, graft, and screw combinations[J]. Spine, 1998, 23: 1946-1955
  • 10[1]Harm JR, Melchen RP. Posterior C1~2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation[J]. Spine, 2001, 26: 2467-2471

共引文献102

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部