期刊文献+

错误的刑事羁押与国家的赔偿责任 被引量:5

Wrongful Detention and State Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事诉讼中的错误羁押与刑事错案常常相伴而生,但二者并非同一概念。错误羁押以刑事程序法为认定依据,即使没有错案发生,羁押行为违反《刑事诉讼法》的规定亦照样构成错误羁押。与错案相联系的错误羁押或合法羁押都应当导致刑事司法机关的国家赔偿责任,而未构成错案但构成错误羁押并因此导致当事人合法权益损害的,国家也应当有条件地承担赔偿责任。国家对无错案条件下错误羁押承担赔偿责任,有利于增强刑事司法机关的程序公正意识和人权保障意识,防止和减少羁押的滥用。 A wrongful detention or a false imprisonment and a misjudged criminal case often have something to do with each other, but indeed they are quite different in concepts. A wrongful detention or a false imprisonment is determined in accordance with the criminal procedural law. A detention or imprisonment is to be held wrongous so long as it violates the criminal procedural law, even if the relevant case is not erroneously decided. Any false or lawful imprisonment connected with a misjudged case results in state compensation by the criminal justice organs. Furthermore, if there appears any wrongful detention that has led to sufferings of a party's lawful interests, even if no misjudged case occurs, the state shall be liable to the party for a conditional compensation. For the criminal justice personnel, it is conducive to the development of the sense of due process and protection of human rights that the state bears a compensatory liability for a wrongful detention even though no case is misjudged. Thus wrongful detentions or false imprisonments ought to be prevented or decreased.
作者 李建明
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第6期37-42,共6页 Modern Law Science
基金 国家社科基金2003规划项目<刑事司法错误问题研究>(03BFX054)的中间成果。
关键词 羁押 错案 刑事司法 国家赔偿责任 机关 国家 刑事程序法 错误 认定依据 条件 compulsory measures detention and imprisonment erroneously decided criminal cases state compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1王晨光."错案追究制"的误区:兼谈法律运行的不确定性.张卫平.司法改革论评(第一辑)[C].北京:中国法制出版社,2001.32.
  • 2[德]克劳思·罗科信.刑事诉讼法(第21版)[M].吴丽琪译.北京:法律出版社,2003.563.564.
  • 3爱伦·豪切斯泰勒·斯黛丽 南希·弗兰克.美国刑事法院诉讼程序[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..

共引文献17

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部