期刊文献+

放牧强度对羊草草地植被再生性能的影响 被引量:34

Effect of grazing intensity on the regrowth capability in Leymus chinensis grassland
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过小区控制放牧试验,研究了放牧强度对松嫩平原羊草草地再生性能的影响。结果表明,再生期间和放牧强度对羊草草地的再生草量和再生速率的影响均达到了显著水平(P<0.05);地上生物量、再生草量和再生速率存在着明显的季节性,都呈"单峰型"变化,其峰值出现在7-8月,相对再生速率随季节变化呈直线下降趋势。在适度放牧强度(P4)下,再生草量和再生速率都最大,这说明一定程度的放牧能够促进牧草再生;根据牧草相对再生速率随放牧强度增大的变化曲线,可以确定本试验条件下适于牧草生长的最适放牧强度为8~12只/100m2。 The effect of grazing intensity on the regrowth capability in Leymus chinensis grassland was studied by grazing experiment. The results showed that the effect of regrowth duration and grazing intensity on regrowth biomass and regrowth speed was significant. There were seasonal dynamics as 'one peak' for aboveground biomass, regrowth biomass and regrowth speed, whose peak appeared in July-August. Relative regrowth speed decreased with change of seasons. Regrowth biomass and regrowth speed reached the climax under proper grazing intensity (P_4 plot), which indicated that proper grazing intensity could promote the regrowth of herbage. Based on the analysis on the relationship between relative regrowth speed and grazing intensity, there was an optimum domain of grazing intensity, which was 8-12 goats/100 m^2.
出处 《草业学报》 CSCD 2004年第6期39-44,共6页 Acta Prataculturae Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(30070545 30270251) 教育部优秀青年教师资助计划资助。
关键词 放牧强度 羊草草地 再生性能 Grazing intensity Leymus chinensis grassland regrowth capability
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Parsons A J, Leafe Collett B, Stiles W. The physiology of grass production under grazing 1 Characteristics of leaf and canopy photosynthesis of continuously grazed swards [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1983,20:117-126.
  • 2McNaughton S J. Grazing as an optimization process: Grass ungulate relationships in the Serengeti[J]. American Naturalist 1979,113:691-703.
  • 3Hart R H, Balla E F. Forage production and removal from western and crested wheatgrass under grazing[J]. Journal of Rangeland Management, 1982,35:362-366.
  • 4Paige K N, Whitham T G. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: The advantage of being eaten[J]. American Naturalist, 1987,129:407-416.
  • 5Sinclair A R E. The resource limitations of trophic levels in tropical grassland ecosystems[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1975,44:497-520.
  • 6Dyer M I, Delting J K, Hilbert D W. The role of herbivores in grassland[A]. In: Estas J R, Tyrland R J, Brunken J N. Grass and grasslands[M]. Norman Oklahom U S A: University of Oklahoma Press, 1982.225-262.
  • 7Dyer M I, Turner I C L, Seasted T R. Herbivory and its consequences[J]. Ecological Application, 1993,3(1):10-16.
  • 8Lacery J R, Van Poollean H W. Comparison of herbage production on moderately grazed and ungrazed westen ranges[J]. Rangeland Management, 1981,34:210-212.
  • 9Vickery P J. Grazing and net primary production of a temperate grassland[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1992,(9):307-314.
  • 10Belsky A J. Does herbivore benefit plants: a review of the evidence[J]. American Naturalist, 1986,127:870-892.

同被引文献504

引证文献34

二级引证文献289

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部