期刊文献+

倾销边际与损害边际反倾销效应分析 被引量:1

Antidumping Game of Dumping Margin and Injury Margin
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立了一个由企业内生选择决定贸易保护水平的不完全竞争二阶段动态反倾销博弈模型,分析了倾销边际与损害边际反倾销税对企业行为的影响,发现倾销边际反倾销税的企业战略动机与损害边际反倾销税的企业激励动机的差异,倾销边际反倾销税在保护本国产业发展方面要优于损害边际反倾销税。 In this paper we develop a dynamic two-period anti-dumping model of imperfect competition to analyze the effects of dumping margin duties and injury margin duties on firm behavior under the level of protection which is endogenously determined by the firms involved. We find the strategic motive of firms under dumping margin duties may run in the opposite direction compared to the incentives for firms provided under injury margin duties. Dumping margin duties perform better than injury margin duties in terms of protecting domestic industries.
作者 杨仕辉
机构地区 湖北大学商学院
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2004年第6期57-61,共5页 Journal of Management Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(02BJL050) 国家教育部人文社会科学"十五"规划基金资助项目(01JA790021)
关键词 倾销边际 损害边际 反倾销税 Dumping margin Injury margin Antidumping duties
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1杨仕辉,熊艳.国际反倾销趋势、特点、成因与我国对策研究[J].管理世界,2002,18(3):19-32. 被引量:40
  • 2杨仕辉.反倾销博弈与逆向选择[J].世界经济,2000,23(1):35-42. 被引量:51
  • 3Pauwels W,Springael L. The Welfare Effects of an Anti-dumping Duty and of a Price-undertaking in the Context of the European Anti-dumping Policy[M].Mimeo, Ufsia, University of Antwerp, 2000.
  • 4Jackson J,Vermulst E. Antidumping Law and Practice[M]. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.
  • 5杨仕辉,王红玲,舒颜颜.反倾销动态博弈与效应分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(11):43-49. 被引量:11
  • 6Fischer R. Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm Behaviour[J].Journal of International Economics, 1992,(32):149-163.
  • 7Prusa T.Pricing Behaviour in the Presence of Antidumping Law[J].Journal of Economic Integration, 1994,9 (2): 260-289.
  • 8Reitzes J.Anti-dumping Policy[J]. International Economic Review, 1993,(4):745-763.
  • 9Staiger R.,Wolak F. The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopoly[DB/OL]. NBER Working Paper, 1990.3254.

二级参考文献16

共引文献94

同被引文献10

  • 1冯巨章.反倾销联合应诉博弈分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(6):124-133. 被引量:12
  • 2李红春.反倾销应诉的集体行动研究——行业协会克服“搭便车”机制的思考[J].时代经贸(下旬),2006(12):61-62. 被引量:2
  • 3宋妍,朱宪辰,刘琦.异质性与行业反倾销应诉的集体行动[J].管理现代化,2007,27(3):11-13. 被引量:4
  • 4Feinberg, Robert M. and Barry T. Hirsch. 1989. Industry Rent Seeking and the Filing of ' Unfair Trade' Complaints [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization(7): 325-340.
  • 5Herander, Mark G. and Roger L. Pupp. 1991. Firm Participation in Steel Industry Lobbying[J]. Economic Inquiry(29): 134-147.
  • 6Kara M. Olson. 2004. Free Riders Among the Rent-Seekers: A Model Of Firm Participation in Antidumping Petitions [EB/OL]. http:// ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0404009.html, NBER Working Paper, April 15.
  • 7Krupp, 1994.Corinne.Antidumping Cases in the U.S. Chemical Industry: A Panel Data Approach [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics (42): 200-311.
  • 8Sabry, Faten. 2000. An Analysis of the Decision to File, the Dumping Estimates, and the Outcome of Antidumping Petitions[J]. The International Trade Journal(14 (2)): 109-145.
  • 9Staiger R W and Wolak F A. 1994. Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States[EB/OL]. http://ideas. repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/4696.html, NBER Working Paper No. 4696.
  • 10杨仕辉.反倾销博弈与逆向选择[J].世界经济,2000,23(1):35-42. 被引量:51

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部