期刊文献+

一种土壤微生物总DNA的高效提取方法 被引量:29

AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR DNA EXTRACTION FROM SOIL MICROORGANISM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 获得高浓度、大片段、多样性程度高的土壤微生物总DNA 是研究土壤微生物群落结构的分子生态学基础。本文采用间接法(菌体细胞回收法)提取红壤地区两种土壤类型的土壤微生物总DNA,定量计算其回收率,并与直接法(细胞原位裂解法)比较了提取效率和纯度。结果表明:红壤地区2种土壤每克干土的总DNA提取量,间接法约为0.34和0.53礸/g干土,直接法约为13.62和24.32礸/g干土;间接法的提取效率低于直接法,但所得DNA片段较大,且Sau 3AⅠ 酶切和16 S rDNA通用引物PCR扩增结果显示,间接法比直接法更能有效地去除土壤中的某些抑制剂,所得总DNA的纯度更高,有利于后续操作。 Isolation of DNA sufficient in purity, large in fragment and high in diversity from natural environments is the basis for molecular ecology study on community structure. In this study, the authors chose an indirect method, which is the cell recovery method, to extract DNA from two distinct red soils in South China, calculate its recovery efficiency and compare with the direct method in DNA yield and purity. The results show that the crude DNA yields from the two soils were about 0.34 and 0.53礸/g by the indirect method and 13.62礸, and 24.32礸/g dried soil by the direct method respectively. Although the indirect DNA extraction method recovered smaller amounts of total DNA than the direct method, the DNA fragments are larger in size. Moreover, the results of Sau3AⅠenzyme digestion and PCR amplification in evaluating DNA purity demonstrate that the indirect method can delete some inhibitor more efficiently, yielding DNA of superior quality more suitable for follow-up procedures.
出处 《土壤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期662-666,共5页 Soils
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40371069) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2003033495) 中国科学院创新项目( KZCX3-SW-417)资助。
关键词 土壤微生物 总DNA提取 细胞回收 粗DNA纯化 Soil microorganism, DNA extraction, Cell re covery method, Crude DNA purification
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1[1]Elsas J D van,Smalla K. Extraction of microbial community DNA from soils. In: Akkermans A D L, van Elsas J D, de Bruijn F J. eds. Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995
  • 2[2]Elsas J D van,Duarte G F,Rosado A S,et al. Microbiological and molecular biological methods for monitoring microbial inoculants and their effects in the soil environment. Jour. Microbial. Methods,1998,32:133~154
  • 3[3]Horton T R,Bruns T D.The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: Peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology,2001,10:1 855~1 871
  • 4[4]Ogram A. Discussion soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: Methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2000,32:1 499~1 504
  • 5[5]Bridge Paul,Brian Spooner. Soil fungi: Diversity and detection. Plant and Soil,2001,232:147~154
  • 6[6]Dunbar J,Ticknor L O,Kuske C Rl. Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbial.,2000,66:2 943~2 950
  • 7[7]Tiedje J M,Asuming-Brempong S,Nüsslein K,et al. Opening the black box of soil microbial diversity. Applied Soil Ecology,1999,13:1 109~1 122
  • 8[8]Ward D M,Weller R,Bateson M M. 16S rRNA sequences reveal numerous unculturated microorganisms in a natural community. Nature,1990,345: 63~65
  • 9[9]Glen M,Tommerup I C,Bougher N L,et al. Specificity,sensitivity and discrimination of primers for PCR-RFLP of larger basidiomycetes and their applicability to identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Eucalyptus forests and plantations. Mycol.Res.,2001,105(2): 138~149
  • 10[10]Viaud M,Pasquier A,Brygoo Y. Diversity of soil fungi studied by PCR-RFLP of ITS. Mycol.Res.,2000,104(9): 1 027~1 032

共引文献329

同被引文献399

引证文献29

二级引证文献585

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部