半开放式与全密闭式静脉输液方式效果的随机对照研究

The effect of half-open infusion model and closed infusion model:a random control study.

目的 为选择一种更加安全、可靠、便捷的输液方式提供科学依据。方法 采用随机对照方法 ,实验组 (n=60 )采用全密闭输液方式 ,对照组 (n =60 )采用半开放式输液方式。结果 两组实验前后的液体作热源、细菌、不溶性微粒检查均在国家药典规定的范围内 ,但两组相比 ,实验组液体内不溶性微粒少于对照组 ,两者差异有统计学意义 (P <0 0 0 1) ;实验组输液操作所用时间较短 (P <0 0 5 ) ;加药与不加药对两组液体内不溶性颗粒的影响差异显著 (P <0 0 0 1) ;但两组残留药液量差异不明显 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 全密闭式输液方式较半开放式输液更为安全、可靠。

Objective To compare the effect of half-open infusion model with closed infusion model to provide a scientific evidence for choosing a safer,more credible,more convenient infusion model.Methods A random control study was used in this research,the study group(n=60)accept closed infusion model,the control group(n=60)accept half-open infusion model.Results The bacteria,pyroxene and the insoluble particle in the fluid of the two groups before and after test all meet the standard of the state pharmacopoeia,but it was also found that,in the study group,the insoluble particle in the fluid was less than that of the control group,there was a significant difference between them(P<0.001),the infusion procedure time was shortened(P<0.05);injecting the medicine into the fluid and no-injecting the medicine have the same effect on the insoluble particle in the two groups.However,the volume of the remnant fluid of the two groups has no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion closed infusion is a safer,more credible,more convenient infusion module,and worth of application and spreading.