期刊文献+

我国上市公司治理中的审计委员会与监事会

Committee on Public Accounts and Board of Supervisors in the Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 审计委员会和监事会是两种不同治理模式下的监督机构,我国的公司一直都设立监事会这一监督模式,但2002年1月,中国证监会颁布的《上市公司治理准则》中提到,应该在上市公司设立审计委员会制度。究竟是何原因导致证监会在目前上市公司设有监事会的基础上,还要设立审计委员会这一监督机构;如何设立及协调,以更有效的发挥监督作用。本文就这些问题作了分析,并力图寻求适合我国国情的最佳选择。 Committee on Public Accounts (CPA) and Board of Supervisors (BS) are two different kinds of supervise organization. Our companies always applied the mode of BS ago, but at the 2002 year January, the listed companies should set up audit office system which was mentioned in the' Guidelines for Listed Corporate Governance'promulgated by Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission. However on the base of board of supervisors built in the listed companies, why does Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission set up Committee on Public Accounts ? And how were Committee on Public Accounts constructed, coordinated and play the role of supervise even more effectively. The article analyzed these problems and strived to seek the best selection suited to our conditions.
作者 姜玉梅
出处 《华东经济管理》 2004年第6期109-111,共3页 East China Economic Management
关键词 审计委员会 监事会 协调 committee on public accounts board of supervisors coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1末永敏和著 金洪玉译.现代日本公司法[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2000..
  • 2周小川.上市公司治理结构的改进[N].中国证券报,2001.05.31.
  • 3青木昌彦,钱颖一.《转轨经济中公司治理结构》,中国经济出版社,1995年4月版.
  • 4"Analysis of Results of 1980 Proxy Statement",Release,Disciosure,Securities and Exchange Commission,No.34-17518,February 5,1991.
  • 5玛丽·S·梅之 刘力云 王德河编译.审计委员会及其与内部审计的关系[J].审计研究资料,1996,(9).

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部