不同输液接头在肿瘤患者中心静脉置管中应用的对比研究

Comparative Study on the Heparin Connector and the Clave Connector for Central Venous Catheterization in Tumor Patients

目的探讨肝素帽接头和可来福接头在肿瘤患者中心静脉置管中应用的利弊。方法选择2002年6月至2003年4月我院肿瘤中心120例中心静脉置管患者,随机分为对照组和试验组;对照组使用肝素帽接头,试验组使用可来福接头,在感染率和堵管率方面进行对比,资料采用x2检验。结果使用可来福接头在降低感染率和堵管率方面与肝素帽接头相比有显著性差异。结论可来福接头可降低感染率和堵管率,使用安全、方便。

Objective To study advantages and disadvantages of the heparin connector and the clave connector for central venous catheterization in tumor patients. Methods 120 hospitalized patients who were treated with central venous catheterization were randomized into two groups; the control group where the patients used the heparin connector, and the study group where the patients used the clave connector. The infection rate and patency of the catheter were compared between the two groups. Results The obstructive rate and the infection rate were lower in the clave group than those in the heparin group. Conclusion The clave connector is safer and more convenient than the heparin connector for central venous catheterization in tumor patients,able to reduce the infection rate and the obstruction rate.