期刊文献+

当代教育管理科学研究中的“学”之辨

On the Academic Standing of Contemporary Study of Educational Administration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以传统的实证科学、理论科学和独立科学等狭义的自然科学观及其相应的学科观来考量教育管理学,它还进不了“学”堂;而将人文社会科学纳入科学序列,以现代广义的大科学观及其相应的学科观来检证教育管理学,则它不仅早已入“学”,而且渐成显“学”,其涵指也因其自身的发展及其所处时代和文化背景的不同而不同。
作者 杨天平
机构地区 浙江师范大学
出处 《现代教育科学(高教研究)》 北大核心 2004年第5期3-7,共5页
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Dennis Philips, (1983), After the Wake: Postpositivistie Educational Thought, Educational Researcher, May 1983, pp.4-12.
  • 2Culbertson, J., (1988), A Century'S Quest for Knowledge Base, In N. J. Boyan (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, New York: Longnan, pp.3-26.
  • 3Fenwick W. English, (1994), Theory in Educational Administration, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, pp. 100-135.
  • 4Willower, Donald J., (1996), Inquiry in Educational Administration and the Spirit of the Times, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32, No.3, (August 1996), pp.344-365.
  • 5Evers, Colin W., Lakomski, Gabriele (1996). Science in Educational Administration: a postpositivist conception, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32, No.3, pp. 379 - 402 . pp. 379 - 402 . pp. 379 - 402 .
  • 6English, Fenwick W., (2001), What Paradighm Shift? An Interrogation of Kuhn's Idea of Normalcy in the Research Practice of Educational Adminisiration., International Journal of leadership in Education, Vol.4, No. I, 29 - 38.
  • 7Hoy, Wayne K., (1994), Foundation of Educational Administration: traditional and emerging perspectives, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 30, No.2, pp.178-198.
  • 8Feyerabend, P, (1995), Problems of Empiricism: philosophical papers, Vol.2, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 25.
  • 9Foster, W. P., (1986), Paradigms and Promises, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, p.35.p.48.
  • 10Evers, C. W. , and G. Lakomski. Exploring Educational Administration: Coherentist Applications and Critical Debates. Pergamon Press. 1996. p. 1.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部