期刊文献+

经济人类学中跨学科趋势的强化 被引量:2

The Increasing Emphasis on Cross-discipline Study of Economic Anthropology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经济人类学是一门典型的边缘交叉学科 ,从发展的先驱阶段起 ,就处于一种“中间”地位 ,具有多样化的研究内容与研究方法。 2 0世纪七八十年代以后 ,经济人类学逐渐向广义方向发展 ,与众多学科及其关注的前沿领域发生更为广泛和更深层面的交叉互动 。 Economic Anthropology is a typical marginal and cross-discipline subject. It has been “in the middle of” different disciplines and had various research contents and methods since it emerged. After 1970s and 1980s, Economic Anthropology gradually developed in a broad sense. It interacted more deeply and broadly with many disciplines and frontier fields concerned, and made considerable progress in cross-discipline research.
作者 施琳
机构地区 中央民族大学
出处 《广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第6期50-52,共3页 Journal of Guangxi University For Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词 经济人类学 跨学科 广义发展 economic anthropology cross-discipline development in broad sense
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Ortize, S.1983, Economic Anthropology, Topics and Theories[M]. introduction.
  • 2[2]Dalton, G. 1968, Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies, Essays of Karl Polanyi[M].A Double Anchor Original.
  • 3[3]Plattner, S. 1989, Economic Anthropology[M].Stanford University Press, Preface.
  • 4[4]Plattner, S. 1989, Economic Anthropology[M].Stanford University Press, Introduction.
  • 5[5]Gross, D. The Ecological Perspective in Economic Anthropology, in Ortize (ed.) Economic Anthropology, Topics and Theories[M].NY. Lanham, 1983.
  • 6[6]Smith, C. Regional Analysis in World-System Perspective: A Critique of Three Structural Theories of Uneven Development, in Ortize (ed.) Economic Anthropology, Topics and Theories[M].NY. Lanham, 1983.
  • 7[7]Salisbury, R. Anthropological Economics and Development Planning, in Ortize (ed.) Economic Anthropology, Topics and Theories[M].NY. Lanham, 1983.
  • 8[8]施琳.经济人类学[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,2004.

同被引文献92

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部