期刊文献+

颈椎椎体次全切除钛网钉板系统的临床应用 被引量:1

Clinical application of titanium mesh cage combined with screw-plate system in cervical spine subtotal corpectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈椎前路椎体次全切除钛网钉板植骨融合的临床效果.方法自2001年3月~2003年3月间应用颈前路椎体次全切除钛网植骨融合及钉板固定治疗颈椎管狭窄性疾病22例,其中4例患者行2椎体次全切除3节椎间隙减压手术.术后观察减压、固定、融合及神经功能恢复情况,并行X线摄片或CT扫描检查.结果患者获6~12个月随访,神经功能得到不同程度改善,无加重情况.椎间隙高度无丢失、无成角,均获得骨性融合.术后3 d在颈围领固定下下床活动,4周后可恢复较轻工作.结论此术式可避免传统手术方法的缺点,即不取自体髂骨,融合率高,稳定性好,并减压彻底,疗效好,是一种值得推广的新技术. Objective To explore the clinical effect on bone graft fusion through anterior approach for cervical spine subtotal corpectomy by titanium mesh cage combined with screw-plate system. Methods From March 2001 to March 2003, 22 cases with cervical spinal stenosis were treated with iliac crest auto-graft by titanium mesh cage and screw-plate through anterior approach for cervical spine subtotal corpectomy, including 4 cases undergoing vertebral subtotal corpectomy in 2 and intervertebral space decompression in 3. Physical, X-ray and CT examinations were taken at regular interval postoperatively to assess the recovery of nervous function, anterior decompression, cervical stability and bony fusion. Results A follow-up was taken to these cases for 6 to 12 months. The nervous functions were recovered in different levels without deterioration; intervertebral space had no decrease on its height and no angulation. The patient fixed with collar after operation could get out of bed in 3 days and do light work in 4 weeks. All cases acquired bony fusion. Conclusion Titanium mesh cage combined with screw-plate system for cervical spine subtotal corpectomy has advantages of less trauma for graft, good stability, higher fusion rate, full decompression, satisfactory clinical effect by the traditional ways. Therefore, this operative method is a new technique and deserved to the further application in clinic.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2004年第6期332-334,共3页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 颈椎 前路减压 钛网钉板植入融合 临床应用 cervical spine anterior decompression fusion by titanium mesh cage combined with screw-plate system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献11

共引文献13

同被引文献20

  • 1郭伟,马振福,孔祥昆,孙飞,苏费宁.腰椎管成形术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床观察(附25例临床报告)[J].脊柱外科杂志,2003,1(2):127-127. 被引量:1
  • 2张佐伦,赵安仁.颈腰段并发的椎间盘病:附21例报告[J].中华骨科杂志,1993,13(6):402-405. 被引量:24
  • 3刘万林,郭文通,李文琪,温树正,杨勇,霍洪军,阙求豪,李力,刘艳阳.颈腰段并存的椎间盘突出症12例报告[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1994,9(2):119-120. 被引量:3
  • 4赵定麟.现代脊柱外科学[M].上海:世界图书出版公司,2006.1167.
  • 5Teng P, Papatheodorou C. Combined cervical and lumbar spondy- losis[J] . Arch Neurol, 1964, 10:298-307.
  • 6Naderi S, Mertol T. Simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery for combined symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenoses [ J ]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2002, 15 (3) :229-231.
  • 7Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, et al. Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management[J]. Neurosur- gery, 1984, 15(4):489-496.
  • 8Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ. Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 1987, 66 (6) : 842-849.
  • 9LaBan MM, Green ML. Concurrent (tandem) cervical and lum- bar spinal stenosis: a 10-yr review of 54 hospitalized patients[J].Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 83(3) :187-190.
  • 10Eskander MS, Aubin ME, Drew JM, et al. Is there a difference between simultaneous or staged decompressions for combined cer- vical and lumbar stenosis? [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24 (6) :409-413.

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部