摘要
本文着重讨论秦都咸阳的辖域及城市功能区域分布等问题。以往人们受《三辅黄图》记载的影响 ,认为秦都咸阳与内史的辖域是重叠的。本文运用文献及出土陶文资料 ,力求说明秦都咸阳的辖域仅限于大约一个县的范围 ,骊山一带也在秦都咸阳的辖域之外 ;2 0世纪 5 0年代末发现的秦咸阳一号建筑遗址 ,长期以来被看作是秦咸阳宫的一部分 ,或者被看作是冀阙的一部分。本文通过对该遗址遗存迹象的分析并结合对咸阳原上下地形地貌的观察 ,提出头道原是官署区 ,二道原是宫殿区 。
This essay emphasisly discusses the controlled region of Qin capital of Xianyang and its function as regional layout of the city . Affected by the records of 'San Fu Yellow Map', people considered that the controlled region Qin capital of Xianyang and Neishi was similar. The essay utilizes documents and unearthed data of inscriptions on pottery. It wants to illustrate that the controlled region in the Qin capital of Xianyang was only limited in a confines of a county approximately. The Lishan belt was located in the controlled region exterior of Qin capital of Xianyang . The No.Ⅰconstruction site of Qin Xianyang found in 1950's late was looked as a portion of Qin Xianyang palace for a long period , or a portion of Ji Que. The essay proposes a new view that the first piece of terrace should be offical bureau district, the second piece of terrace be a palace district , the northern slope of Wei River should be a lived district of the common people through the analysis on the trace of the site combined a survey on the terrain of Xianyang plain .
出处
《中国历史地理论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第2期71-75,共5页
Journal of Chinese Historical Geography