期刊文献+

交河故城形制布局特点研究 被引量:12

A STUDY OF THE LAYOUT OF THE ANCIENT CITY OF JIAOHE
原文传递
导出
摘要 19世纪末20世纪初以来,国内外的一些学者在交河故城曾陆续做过调查或试掘。然而,由于其资料零散且发表的有限,尚不能据以研究交河故城的形制布局。改革开放之后,交河故城的考古工作有较大的进展。特别是1992年10月至1996年4月。 The present paper researches mainly into the features of ancient Jiaohe city in shape and layout and consists of the following ten parts.1.The overall planning of urban construction based on the natural geographical features.2.The unique combination of the axis and main streets and staggered city gates.3.Strip-shaped overall layout and block-shaped area planning.4.The city road system in the strip and block combined form and the appearance of'annular islands'.5.The location of government offices in the center of the city and the concentrated construction of official buildings.6.Dwelling units mainly in the form of high- walled compound.7.The wide distribution of temples in the city and the reasonable control of their density.8.Graveyards as a part of the overall layout of the city.9.Ingenious symmetry,the bird's-eye view and the scenic focal point.10.The perfect defensive system contained in the city plan.Based on specific analyses of the above ten parts,the author points out their internal organic relationship.In the conclusion,the paper discusses the date and nature of the city,which are closely related to its extant plan and layout,and makes a summary as follows. The extant shape and layout had no relationship with Jiaohe city of the Han Qoco period.Their foundation was laid in the Qoco Kingdom of the Qu house.They were formed to the Tang dynasty under a great influence of Tang Chang'an city.From AD 791,Jiaohe city was controlled by Tufan over 70 years,when it went from flourish to declination.In the Qoco Uigur period,the role of Jiaohe city was replaced by Turfan city (Anle city of the Tang dynasty).At that time,only a part of Buddhist temples and secular constructions were rebuilt,enlarged or newly made in Jiaohe city,while the overall layout was roughly the same as that in the Tang period.Furthermore,the city was not destroyed by the'Holy War',but by the arbitrary spread of Islamism after the'Holy War',and finally was deserted at the turn of the Ming and Qing dynasties.Its extant shaped and layout show that Jiaohe city was a political,religious and military center.
作者 孟凡人
出处 《考古学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第4期483-508,共26页 Acta Archaeologica Sinica
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1中国国家文物局,新疆维吾尔自治区文物局等.《交河故城保护与研究》,新疆人民出版社,1999年.
  • 2《交河故城保护与研究》.解耀华.《交河故城的历史与保护修缮工程》一文之三,“交河故城遗址布局与保护现状”.
  • 3《交河故城保护与研究》.柳洪亮:《交河故城城市布局调查》.
  • 4《交河故城保护与研究》.贾应逸.《交河故城佛教遣址调查报告》.
  • 5斯坦因:《亚洲腹地》第17章,第三卷图版线图24,“高昌故城平面图”(Innermost Asia :Detailed Report of Explorations in Central Asia,Kan-Su and Easten Iran. Volumes I - IV. oxford ,Clarendon Press,1928).
  • 6孟凡人.略论高昌回鹘的佛教[J].新疆社会科学,1982(1):58-74. 被引量:18
  • 7.《汉书·西域传》[M].中华书局点校本,1962年.第3916-3917页.
  • 8.《后汉书·西域传》[M].,..
  • 9《晋书·张骏传》.
  • 10《魏书·本纪》.

二级参考文献48

  • 1陈梦家.亩制与里制[J].考古,1966(1):36-45. 被引量:60
  • 2郭沫若.新疆新出土的晋人写本《三国志》残卷[J].文物,1972(8):2-6. 被引量:17
  • 3《汉书·西域传》,北京:中华书局,1962年版,第3913页,第3916页,第3873页,第3912页,第3913页.
  • 4《魏书》卷一〇一《高昌传》,中华书局,1974年,第2244页.
  • 5西岛定生,冯佐哲、邱藏、黎潮译.《中国经济史研究》 .农业出版社,1984年.第153页.
  • 6《吐鲁番出土文书》第二册,第345页.
  • 7《周书·高昌传》.
  • 8侯灿.《麴氏高昌王国官制研究》[J].文史,1984,22:29-76.
  • 9《吐鲁番出土文书》第一册.北京:文物山版社,1981年版,第131、146页.
  • 10岑仲勉.《西突厥史料补阙及考证》.

共引文献102

同被引文献188

引证文献12

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部