摘要
本文认为《后汉书》取代《东观汉记》列入“三史”的根本原因还是在于二书自身的质量高下。在唐代的三史中 ,《汉书》的研究风气最盛 ,但《史记》的地位决非“最下” ,而是远高于《后汉书》。在唐初 ,史学与进士科没有直接关系 ,国家因之采取了一系列鼓励进士习史的措施 ,从而有“一史科”的出现。穆宗时终于有了常科“三史科”的设立 ,原属制举的“一史”也变为常举 ,它们既是礼部贡举的科目 ,也是吏部科目选的科目。
This article holds that the basic reason of Hou\|Han Shu listed in Sanshi instead of DongGuanHanJi was the quality of the two pieces of works themselves. For SanShi in the Tang dynasty, the atmosphere of studying HanShu was the most popular. The position of ShiJi far exceeded that of HouHanShu. In early Tang dynasty, historiography hadn\'t been direct connections with the imperial examinations system. The feudal state took a series of measures to encourage the successful candidates in the highest imperial examinations to learn history. YiShi subject came into being. SanShi Subject formed in MuZong period and Yi Shi were both the different styles of election systems.[
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第1期32-42,共11页
Journal of Historiography