摘要
相关选择论认为 ,不仅怀疑主义的假设不是相关选择 ,与认识无关 ,而且怀疑主义的论证方式也不具普适性 ,因此 ,怀疑主义的论证是错误的。相关选择论对知识论有重要的启示意义。
The theory of relevant alternatives considers that the argument of ske pticism is wrong because not only the hypotheses of skepticism are not relevant alternatives and irrelevant to cognition, but also the mode of arguments of skep ticism, which is epistemic closure theory, is not universally applicable. The t heory of relevant alternatives inspires well to epistemology.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第11期40-44,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
20 0 2年度国家社科基金项目<当代知识论前沿问题研究>(批准号 :0 2BZX0 4 2 )阶段性成果之一
关键词
相关选择论
知识闭合论
怀疑主义
“斑马案例”
theory of relevant alternatives
epistemic closure theory
skepticism
the case of zebra
