期刊文献+

GPSO3和Vaisala臭氧探空仪平行施放比对结果的初步分析 被引量:11

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON PARALLEL COMPARISON OF GPSO3 AND VAISALA OZONESONDES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为促进中国大气臭氧高空探测业务化进程 ,中国科学院大气物理研究所和中国气象局监测网络司联合组织了对国产GPS数字化大气臭氧探空仪 (GPSO3)和芬兰Vaisala公司产大气臭氧探空仪 (Vaisala)主要技术性能的比对。现场平行施放比对于 2 0 0 2年 1月在北京进行 ,共施放了 7对臭氧探空仪。对两类大气臭氧探空仪现场平行施放比对试验结果的分析表明 ,两种臭氧探空仪所获得的大气中臭氧浓度随高度的变化特征之间有很好的一致性。在 1 2~ 2 7km高度范围内 ,两种探空仪臭氧测值之间的相对误差平均在 1 0 %以内 ,而在 1 0km以下和 2 7km以上 ,GPSO3探空仪的臭氧测值偏高。本文介绍了比对方法 。 Parallel comparison of GPSO3 (made in China) and Vaisala (made in Finland) ozonesondes was carried out at Atmospheric Observing Experimental Base, CMA, in Beijing during the period of Jan. 11—23, 2002, 7 pairs of ozonesondes were launched. Comparison results show a relative good consistence in the ozone vertical variation characteristics obtained by both type of ozonesondes in general.The average relative error between ozone concentrations at 12—27 km in the atmosphere measured by the both type ozonesondes is less than 10%, while at altitudes below 12 km and above 27 km, the measured ozone concentration by GPSO3 sonde is higher than that by the Vaisala one. Comparison method is introduced, comparison results of some ozone variation futures are analyzed, a possible influence of sonde ascending speeds during soundings on the comparison results is discussed as well.
出处 《应用气象学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期672-680,共9页 Journal of Applied Meteorological Science
基金 中国科学院重大方向项目 :北京地区平 对交换的探测与分析 (KZCX3 SW 2 1 7)
关键词 施放 臭氧探空仪 大气臭氧 大气物理 业务化 中国气象局 廓线 比对 联合 分析 Atmospheric ozone Ozonesonde Sonde comparison Ozone vertical distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献41

  • 1周立波,邹捍,季崇萍,吴瑞欢.斯堪的纳维亚臭氧亏损和地面加热[J].气候与环境研究,2000,5(3):242-248. 被引量:2
  • 2孙金辉,夏其林,邱金桓,吕达仁.激光雷达探测南极平流层云[J].南极研究,1995,7(1):44-49. 被引量:7
  • 3徐群.皮纳图博火山云对1992年大范围气候的影响[J].应用气象学报,1995,6(1):25-42. 被引量:21
  • 4孔琴心,刘广仁,王庚辰.1993年春季南极中山站上空大气臭氧的观测分析[J].大气科学,1996,20(4):395-400. 被引量:19
  • 5[1]IPCC 2001. Climate change 2001, the scientific basis[A]. In: Prather M, Ehhalt D, eds. Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases[C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2001. 239-287.
  • 6[2]Hofmann D J, Pyle J A. Predicting future ozone changes and detection of recovery (Chapter 12) [A]. In: WMO ed. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:1998[C]. Geneva,1999,12:1-57.
  • 7[4]Kerr J B, Mcelroy T, Fast H, et al. The 1991 WMO Ozone sonde intercomparison[A]. In:Robert D Hudson, ed. Ozone in the Troposphere and Stratosphere[C]. Maryland, USA: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, 1994. 807-810.
  • 8[5]WMO programme news. Ozone standard operating procedures: GAW-sponsored Julich Ozonesonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE)[J]. WMO Bulletin, 2002, 51(1): 76.
  • 9[9]Wang Gengchen, Wang Yinjian. Ground-based and balloon-borne measurements of atmospheric ozone[A]. In: Hu Wenrui ed. Advances in Solar-Terrestrial Science of China[C]. Beijing, New York: Science Press, 1992.
  • 10[11]Liu Qijun, Zheng Xiangdong, Luo Chao, et al. Ozone vertical profile characteristics over Qinghai plateau measured by ECC ozonesondes[J]. Advance in Atmospheric Science, 1997, 14(4): 481-490.

共引文献66

同被引文献166

引证文献11

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部