期刊文献+

温带半干旱地区草坪草与主要杂草抗旱性的比较研究 被引量:12

Comparative analysis of the drought-resistances for turfgrass and main weeds in the temperate semi-arid region.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测定温带半干旱区草坪草 (草地早熟禾 )和 6种主要杂草 (早开堇菜、止血马唐、鼠掌老鹳草、鹅绒委陵菜、欧亚旋复花、铺地委陵菜 )的萎蔫系数和干旱胁迫下的存活天数 ,根据耗水系数对 7种植物的抗旱性进行了比较。结果表明 ,止血马唐的萎蔫系数最小 ,草地早熟禾的萎蔫系数次之 ,欧亚旋复花的萎蔫系数最大 ,草地早熟禾、止血马唐的萎蔫系数分别与欧亚旋复花、鼠掌老鹳草的萎蔫系数有显著差异。 7种植物的生理抗旱性大小依次是草地早熟禾 >止血马唐 >铺地委陵菜 >鹅绒委陵菜 >早开堇菜 >鼠掌老鹳草 >欧亚旋复花。 The wilting coefficients and the survival days of turfgrass (Poa pratensis) and 6 main weeds (Viola prionantha,Digitaria ischaemum,Geranium sibiricum,Potentilla anserine,Inula britanica and Potentilla supina) in the temperate semi-arid region were measured under drought stress and the drought-resistances were compared according to the soil water depleted index (SWDI).The results showed that the wilting coefficient of Digitaria ischaemum was the lowest,then Poa pratensi the second,and that of Inula britanica was the highest.The wilting coefficients of Poa pratensis,Digitaria ischaemum were remarkably different from that of Inula britanica and Geranium sibiricum.The physiological drought-resistances of the seven species were in the order of Poa pratensis> Digitaria ischaemum> Potentilla supina> Potentilla anserina> Viola prionantha> Geranium sibiricum> Inula britanica.
出处 《生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第1期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ecology
基金 内蒙古草地生态学重点实验室基金资助项目
关键词 草坪草 杂草 萎蔫系数 抗旱性 turfgrass,weeds,wilting coefficient,drought-resistances.
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1徐炳成,山仑,黄占斌.草坪草对干旱胁迫的反应及适应性研究进展[J].中国草地,2001,23(2):55-61. 被引量:71
  • 2夏合新,杨红,周刚.12个树种草种生态学特性研究[J].生态学杂志,1996,15(6):9-12. 被引量:1
  • 3Bonos SA, Murphy JA. 1999. Growth response and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress [J]. Crop Sci., 39:770- 774.
  • 4Carrow RN. 1996. Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars[ J ]. Crop Sci., 36 : 371 - 377.
  • 5Huang BR, Fry JD. 1998. Root anatomical physiological and morphological responses to drought stress for tall rescue cultivars[J ]. Crop Sci., 38; 1017-1022.
  • 6Kim KS, Beard JB. 1988. Comparative turf-grass evapotranspiration rates and associates plant morphological characteristics[J]. Crop Sci. ,28:328-331.
  • 7Sharp RE, Davies WJ, 1989. Regulation by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plant [J]. Planta, 147:43-49.
  • 8Sheffer KM, Dunn JH, Minner DD. 1987. Summer drought response and rooting depth of three cool-season turfgrass [J ]. Hort Sci., 22 : 296-297.
  • 9Bonos SA, Murphy JA. 1999. Growth response and performance of Kentucky bluegrass under summer stress [J ]. Crop Sci , 39:770- 774.
  • 10Carrow RN. 1996. Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars[ J ]. Crop Sci , 36 : 371 - 377.

二级参考文献6

  • 1马育华,试验设计(第2版),1995年
  • 2杨玉坡,长江上游(川江)防护林研究,1993年
  • 3郎奎健,IBM PC系列程序集,1989年
  • 4Huang B R,Crop Sci,2000年,40卷,196页
  • 5Huang B R,Crop Sci,1998年,38卷,1017页
  • 6Huang B R,Crop Sci,1997年,38卷,1858页

共引文献70

同被引文献142

引证文献12

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部