期刊文献+

高级别星形细胞瘤扩散张量成像应用研究 被引量:3

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of High-Grade Astrocytomas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :研究平均扩散系数 (ADC)和各向异性分数 (FA)在鉴别高级别星形细胞瘤肿瘤组织、水肿及正常脑组织中的价值。方法 :16例高级别星形细胞瘤在治疗前行常规MRI及扩散张量成像 (DTI)。在T1WI增强、T2 WI及FA图上确定肿瘤、水肿及邻近正常白质区 ,测量并分析这些区域FA值及ADC值的差异。结果 :在ADC图上 ,肿瘤实体区与正常脑实质相比 ,几乎呈等信号 ;水肿区呈稍高信号 ;肿瘤囊变坏死区呈高信号。在FA图上 ,囊变坏死区呈低信号 ;肿瘤区呈等信号及低信号 ;水肿区呈等信号及稍高信号。肿瘤囊变坏死区ADC值 (2 .16± 0 .14 7)× 10 -3 mm2 /s ,水肿区 (1.5 5± 0 .0 66)× 10 -3 mm2 /s ,肿瘤实体区 (1.3 3± 0 .0 8)× 10 -3 mm2 /s ,邻近正常白质区 (0 .76± 0 .0 5 7)× 10 -3 mm2 /s。邻近正常白质区FA值最高 (0 .45± 0 .0 3 7) ,肿瘤囊变坏死区最低 (0 .0 5± 0 .0 12 )。所有患者肿瘤实体区与水肿区、正常白质区ADC值的差别均具有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5 )。所有患者肿瘤实体区、水肿区与正常白质区FA值差异有显著性意义 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,肿瘤实体区与水肿区FA值差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :ADC值可用于区分正常脑白质、水肿和肿瘤实体区 ,FA值对于组织学鉴别无明显意义。ADC值。 Objective:To evaluate the usefulness of FA and ADC in differentiating tumor,edema area,and normal white matter.Methods:16 patients with pathological grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ astrocytomas underwent conventional MR and DTI before therapy.Tumor,edema and apparent normal white matter regions of brain were determined on T 2WI and contrast-enhanced T 1WI images.Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) value and fractional anisotropy (FA) value were calculated in areas of tumor,edema,and normal brain.Comparisons were made by analysis of each variance.Results:On ADC map,the tumors were almost isointense compared with the normal brain,and the edematous brain was slightly hyperintense than the normal brain;necrotic tumor core showed high signal.On FA map,the necrotic tumor core appeared hypointense,the tumor appeared isointense or hypointense,the edematous brain appeared isointense or slightly hyperintense.The ADC value was the highest in the necrotic tumor core(2.16±0.147)×10 -3 mm 2/s,followed by edematous brain(1.55 ±0.066)×10 -3 mm 2/s,enhancing tumor tissue(1.33 ±0.08)×10 -3 mm 2/s,and normal white matter (0.76±0.057)×10 -3 mm 2/s.FA was the lowest in the necrotic core (0.05±0.012) and was the highest in normal white matter (0.45±0.037).ADC was significantly different in enhancing tumor,necrotic tumor core,edematous and normal white matter in all patients.FA was significantly different in tumor solid area,necrotic tumor core and normal white matter in all cases.There was no significant difference of FA value between tumor and edematous brain on FA map.Conclusion:ADC value can help to distinguish tumor from adjacent edema,necrotic tumor core and normal white matter.FA value added no benefit to differentiation diagnosis.Further study are needed to confirm whether ADC value and FA value can be used to differentiate tumor invasion.
出处 《放射学实践》 2005年第1期11-14,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 星形细胞瘤 磁共振成像 扩散张量成像 Astrocytomas Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion tensor imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1夏爽,祁吉.扩散加权成像在部分颅内病变中的应用[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2003,26(5):273-277. 被引量:9
  • 2Stadnik TW,Chaskis C, Michotl E, et al. Diffusion- Weighted MR Imaging of Intracerebral Masses: Comparison with Conventional MR Imaging and Histological Findings[J]. AJNR, 2001,22 ( 5 ):969-976.
  • 3Brian WT,Roham MO,Khader HA, et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter Tracts in Patients with Cerebral Neoplasm [J]. J Neurosurg,2002,97(3) :568-575.
  • 4Basser PJ,Pajevic S,Pierpaoli C,et al. In Vivo Fiber Tractography Using DT-MRI Data[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2000,44(4) :625-632.
  • 5Stieltjes B, Kaufmann WE, Zijl PC, et al. Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Axonal Tracking in the Human Brainstem[J]. Neuroimage,2001,14(3): 723-735.
  • 6Pajevic S,Pierpaoli C. Color Schemes to Represent the Orientation of Anisotropic Tissues from Diffusion Tensor Data:Application to White Matter Fiber Tract Mapping in the Human Brain[J]. Magn Reson Med,2000,43(6) :921.
  • 7Brunberg JA,Chenerert TL,Mckeever PE,et al. In Vivo MR Determination of Water Diffusion Coefficients and Diffusion Anisotropy:Correlation with Structural Alteration in Gliomas of the Cerebral Hemispheres[J]. AJNR, 1995,16(2) :361- 371.
  • 8Inglis BA,Bossart EL, Buckley DL,et al. Visualization of Neural Tissue Water Compartments Using Biexponential Diffusion Tensor MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med,2001,45(4) :580-587.
  • 9Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted MRI with Echo-Planar Technique in the Evaluation of Cellularity in Gliomas[J]. J Magn Reson Imag, 1999,9 ( 1 ): 53-60.
  • 10Beppu T, Inoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Measurement of Fractional Anisotropy Using Diffusion Tensor MRI in Supratentorial Astrocytic Tumors[J]. J Neuro Oncol, 2003,63 (2): 109-116.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Schaefer PW, Grant E, Gonzalez G . Diffusion - weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology, 2000, 217(2) : 331-345.
  • 2Stadnik TW, Chaskis C, Michotl E, et al. Diffusion - weighted MR imaging of intra cerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. AJNR, 2001, 22(5) : 969-976.
  • 3Brunberg JA, Chenerert TL, Mckeever PE, et al. In vivo MR determination of water diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy: correlatrion with structural alteration in gliomas ofthe cerebral hemispheres. AJNR, 1995, 16(3) :631-671.
  • 4Wang L, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Head and neck lesions : characterization with diffusion - weighted - planar MR imaging. Radiology, 2001,218(3) : 621-630.
  • 5Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Friedman H. MR imaging of highgrade gliomas: value of diffusion- weighted echo- planar pulsese quences. AIR, 1994, 162(3) :671-677.
  • 6Pierpaoli C0 Basser PJ.Toward a quantitative assessement of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med, 2000, 36(5) : 893-906.
  • 7Robert R, Edelman0 Weilopolski P, et al. Echo- planar MR imaging. Radiology, 1994, 193(3) :600-612.
  • 8Hunsche T, Moseley ME, Stoeter D, et al. Diffusion - tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T : initial observations. Radiology,2001, 221 (2) : 550-556.
  • 9Sinha S, Bastin ME, Whittle IR, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of high - grade cerebral gliomas. AJNR, 2002, 23(3) :520-527.
  • 10Nomura Y,Sakuma H, Takeda I, et al. Diffusional anisotropy of human brain assessed with diffusion- weighted MR: relation with normal brain development and aging. AJNR, 1994, 15(2):231-238.

共引文献8

同被引文献18

  • 1孙涛,危群,袁志伟.原发性枕叶胶质母细胞瘤的组织细胞学特点(附一例报告)[J].临床误诊误治,2004,17(10):715-715. 被引量:1
  • 2林志雄,王炜,陈锦峰,王晨阳,梅文忠.脑胶质瘤瘤周水肿机制及临床意义[J].中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志,1995,2(3):168-171. 被引量:5
  • 3武洪林,陈君坤,张宗军,卢光明,陈自谦,黄伟,季学满,唐晓俊,李林.MR积分法与灌注成像在脑胶质瘤中的对照研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):151-154. 被引量:7
  • 4杨伊林,邢伟,邵耐远,彭亚,徐寿良,俞胜男.MR灌注成像在脑胶质瘤术前分级中的价值[J].放射学实践,2004,19(12):896-898. 被引量:4
  • 5杨桂芬,田伟.脑胶质瘤的^1H MRS[J].放射学实践,2005,20(4):364-367. 被引量:1
  • 6Beppu T, houe T, Shibata Y, et al. Measurement of frac- tional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratento- rial astrocytic tumors [J]. J Neurooncology, 2003, 63(2): 109-116.
  • 7Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S, et al. Differentiation between gliobla stomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging [J]. Neuroimage, 2009, 44(3): 653-660.
  • 8Shi L, Zhang H, Meng YF, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in ring-enhancing cerebral lesions [J]. Appl Magn Resort, 2010, 38(4): 431-442.
  • 9Provenzale JM, McGraw P, Mhatre P, et al. Peritumoral brain ,gions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(2): 451-460.
  • 10Cha S,Knopp EA,Johnson G,et al.Intracranial Mass Lesion:Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Susceptibility-weighted Echo-planar Perfusion MR Imaging[J].Radiology,2002,223 (1):11-29.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部