期刊文献+

海底油气管道焊接接头的安全评定 被引量:3

Safe assessment for welded joint of offshore pipeline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用欧共体提出的结构完整性评定方法SINTAP(StructuralIntegrityAssessmentProcedure) ,针对API5LX6 5管线钢焊接接头焊趾处的表面裂纹和埋藏裂纹进行安全评定。评定是在给定裂纹尺寸和载荷条件下 ,应用有限元分析 ,根据CTOD(裂纹尖端张开位移 )试验结果进行的。同时根据母材和全焊缝拉伸试验结果 ,建立了X6 5管线钢焊接接头的一级、三级评定曲线。评定结果表明 ,不论是采用一级或是三级评定 ,各评定点均在评定曲线定义的范围内 ,说明该结构是安全的。将SINTAP安全评定方法应用于管道结构 。 Structure integrity assessment procedure (SINTAP) sponsored by the European commission was applied to assessment for welded joints of the API 5L X65 pipeline steel with embedded flaw and surface flaw at the weld toe. Given crack size and load, the assessment was carried out according to the crack tip opening displacement test result and using finite element analysis. The failure lines of level 1 and 3 of the weld were derived from the tensile test results. The assessment showed that all assessment points are located within the failure lines of analysis level 1 and 3. Therefore, welded joint of the pipeline is safe. This study laid the foundation of application of SINTAP to pipeline structure assessment.
出处 《焊接学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期27-30,34,共5页 Transactions of The China Welding Institution
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (5 0 375 1 0 9) 中国海洋石油工程股份有限公司资助项目
关键词 SINTAP 失效评定图 安全评定 管道焊接 Cracks Failure analysis Finite element method Fracture toughness Loads (forces) Offshore pipelines Steel Strain Stress analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Stephen Webster, Adam Bannister. Structural integrity assessment procedure for Europe of the SINTAP programme overview [J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 481 -514.
  • 2Zerbst U, Hamann R, Wohlschlegel A. Application of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP to pipes[J]. The International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping , 2000,77 (11): 697- 702.
  • 3Ainsworth R A, Gutierrez - Solana F, Ocejo J R. Analysis levels within the SINTAP defect assessment procedures[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics Volume , 2000,67(6): 515 -527.
  • 4BS 7448 :Part 1:1991, Fracture mechanics toughness tests: Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J values of metallic materials[S].
  • 5Stacey A, Barthelemy J Y, Leggatt R H. Incorporation of residual stresses into the SINTAP defect assessment procedure [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000,67 (6): 573 - 611.

共引文献1

同被引文献20

  • 1章光,朱维申.参数敏感性分析与试验方案优化[J].岩土力学,1993,14(1):51-58. 被引量:125
  • 2刘明亮,张玉凤,霍立兴,邓彩艳.海底管道安全性评定方法的分析[J].焊接学报,2006,27(8):75-78. 被引量:6
  • 3郑磊,高珊,陆敏.海底管线用钢的开发和应用[J].焊管,2006,29(5):36-39. 被引量:26
  • 4Silwal B, Li L, Deceuster A, et al. Effect of post-weld heat treat- ment on the toughness of heat-affected zone for grade 91 steel[ J]. Welding Journal, 2013, 92(3) : 80 -87.
  • 5Offshore Standard DNV-OS-F101. Submarine pipeline systems [ S]. Det Norske Veritas, 2012.
  • 6Norsok Standard. Structural steel fabrication [ S ]. Det Norske Veritas, 2000.
  • 7British Standards Institution, BS 7910. Guide to methods for as- sessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures [ S ]. UK : British Standards Institution, 2005.
  • 8Hancock P, Chubb J P, Spurrier J. A new perspective on the in- fluence of thickness and post-weld heat treatment for large scale welded joints[ J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technolo- gy, 1995, 117(2) : 209 -214.
  • 9ISO15653 : 2010, Metallic materials-Method of test for the deter- mination of quasi static fracture toughness of welds[ S ]. Switzer- land, 2010. DNV-OS-C401.
  • 10Fabrication and testing of offshorc stnwtures [ S]. Det Norske Veritas. 2013.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部