试论中国产品质量的归责原则

On the Responsibility Judgment Principle about the Products Quality

我国法学 (学术 )界对中国产品质量的归责问题有几种不同的观点 :第一种是“过失责任说” ;第二种是“过错推定说” ;第三种是“视为有过错说” ;第四种是“严格责任说”或“无过错责任说” ;第五种是“综合责任说”。第五种观点既总结了以往法学界在产品责任归责上的研究成果 ,又结合了《产品质量法》的规定 ,基本上反映了我国产品责任的法律现状。然而我国目前的《产品质量法》处罚仍偏轻。加重处罚 ,提高法律的可操作性是进一步完善《产品责任法》或《产品质量法》

Some ideas on the responsibility judgment principle of products quality in law science circles are as followed:liability for fault;fault inference; taking as faults; rigid responsibility or liability without fault; comprehensive respensibility. The last one concluded the research achievement of law academic circles before and connected with the rules of Products Quality Law almost shows the law situation of the field. however,the problem of light punishment exists in the Products Quality Law.Severe penalty and law's feasibility will be important to improve the Products Quality Law and Products Responsibility Law.