期刊文献+

大城市居民生活消费的生态占用初探——对北京、上海的案例研究 被引量:103

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF LIVING CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA IN METROPOLIS:A CASE STUDY OF BEIJING AND SHANGHAI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生态占用方法是通过跟踪人类利用的大多数消费品和产生的废弃物 ,来计算生产和维持这些消费及同化废弃物所需要的生物生产性土地面积 ,并与生态承载力进行比较 ,以此衡量可持续发展的程度。该文运用生态占用分析方法 ,以北京市、上海市为例 ,估算了 1 999年两市居民的食物、衣着、生活用品、生活用能等主要生活消费占用的生态空间。两市居民人均生态占用面积分别为 1 62hm2 和 1 3 3hm2 ,其中存在由于地方生活习惯差异造成的生态占用面积及类型的差异。虽然估算相对保守 ,但全市居民生态占用的总面积已经数十倍于城市实际面积。城市显然是“生态赤字”区 ,城市居民依赖于城市边界之外的生态系统满足基本生活需求。随着我国今后城市化步伐的加快 ,城市可持续发展问题将越来越重要 ,开展城市生态占用这一科学问题的研究也变得十分紧迫和重要。 Ecological footprint is suggested to offer a conceptual framework and methodology to evaluate sustainability. The ecological footprint is described with the area of productive areas and water ecosystems, which is necessary to produce the resources that people consume and to assimilate the wastes that people output.The ecological footprint of major living consumption per capita in Beijing and Shanghai in 1999 is presented in this paper. First, the consumption is estimated for each relevant category, which includes food, clothing, household facility, fuel and housing. Second, the productive area is estimated for different land categories. The productive land area, including fossil energy land, arable land, pasture, forest, built up areas and sea, are calculated with average yields and adjusted with equivalence factor. Finally, all area figures are summed. The results indicate that the ecological footprint per capita in Beijing and Shanghai is 1.62 hm 2 and 1.33 hm 2, respectively. The differences of ecosystem footprint between Beijing and Shanghai can be ascribed to the diverse living habits and customs within two cities. To accommodate the urban residents, the ecological footprint for Beijing and Shanghai would be 22 and 57 times larger than their territories. Accordingly, it is apparent that city is the area of ecological deficit, and the ecosystems upon which the residents depend are beyond their home territories. Therefore, to develop the sustainable city, we should consider the capacities of ecosystems and advocate the ecological ways of life and consumption.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2001年第6期24-28,共5页 Resources Science
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目 (G19980 40 80 0 ) 中国科学院"百人计划项目"生态系统管理的基础生态学过程研究项目 "知识创新工程"领域前沿项目 (CX10G -C0 0 -0 1)资助
关键词 城市居民 生态占用 居民生活消费 北京 上海 废弃物 生态经济 生物生产性土地面积 Ecological footprint Living consumption Beiing Shanghai
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1李利锋,成升魁.生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4):375-382. 被引量:170
  • 2Wackernagel M. and Rees W.E. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on theEarth [M]. Gabriola Press New Society Publishing B.C., 1996.
  • 3Wackernagel M. and Rees W.E. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing innatural capital: economics from an ecological footprint perspective [J]. EecologicalEconomics, 1997,20:3~24.
  • 4杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636. 被引量:643
  • 5Mathis Wackernagel,Lillemor Lewan,Carina Borgstrom Hansson,闵庆文.利用生态痕迹评价自然资本的利用在瑞典及亚区的应用[J].AMBIO-人类环境杂志,1999,28(7):604-611. 被引量:160
  • 6Van den Bergh J., Verbruggen H. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: anevaluation of the ecological footprint [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29: 61~72.
  • 7William E. Rees. Eco-footprint analysis: Merits and brickbats[J]. EcologicalEconomics ,2000,32:371~374.
  • 8Ian Moffatt. Ecological footprint and sustainable development [J]. EcologicalEconomics, 2000,32: 359~362.
  • 9国家统计局编.中国统计年鉴2000[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2000(总第19期).6,95.
  • 10北京市统计局编.北京统计年鉴2000[R].北京:中国统计出版社,2000.Beijing Municipal Statistical Bureau. Statistical Yearbook of Beijing 2000[R].Beijing:China Statistical Publishing House, 2000.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1] William E R. Revisiting Carrying Capacity: Area-Based Indicators of Sustainability[A]. In:Wackernagel M, ed. Ecological Footprints of Nations[EB/OL] http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint/,1996.
  • 2[2] 李永展.台湾地区生态足迹量度之研究[Z].台湾区域科学学会98年度年会论文研讨会(B),2000.
  • 3[3] Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprints of Nations[EB/OL].See: http://www.encouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint.html,1997.
  • 4[4] William E R. Ecological Footprints And Sustainability Gap.
  • 5[EB/OL] http://www.interchg.ubc.ca/plan/scarp.html,1996.
  • 6[5] Wackernagel M. The Ecological Footprints of Santiago de Chile[EB/OL]. http://www.iclei.org/iclei/santiago.html,1998.
  • 7[6] Wackernagel M. What We Use and What We Have: Ecological Footprint and Ecological Capacity[EB/OL]. http://www.rprogress.org/resources/,1999.
  • 8[7] Lower Fraser Basin Eco-Research Project. How sustainable are our choices[EB/OL].See: http://www.ire.ubc.ca/ecoresearch/ecoftpr.html,2000.
  • 9国家环保局,21世纪议程,1993年

共引文献859

同被引文献1225

引证文献103

二级引证文献1461

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部