走向多元的中国思想史研究(专题讨论)

Studies on History of Chinese Thought That Go Toward Multi-elements (Special topic for discussion)

周群认为,文学之士在思想史上的作用是思想史研究中有待开掘的一个领域。文学之士的思想创制较儒士灵活自由,对个性解放思潮具有重要的推动作用,其"荡越"思想也容易引起传统势力的诟病使其所信奉的思潮而很快消减;他们的思想贡献因文名所掩,常常被忽略。颜世安尝试从历史角度来研究古代人文思想的"超越性"取向,具体则落在春秋前中期的诸夏认同和华夷之辨这一"点"上,由此方可显现《论语》中孔子与弟子对话的观念背景。方旭东认为,思想史边界之所以成为一个问题,与思想史这门学科的特殊性不无关系。这种特殊性,使人对思想史的合法性产生怀疑。因此,思想史只有将人类历史上对时代精神课题作出归纳并试图作出解答的富有启发意义的思考作为自己的研究对象,它作为一门独立的学科才可以成立。

In the opinion of Zhou Qun, men of letters are free in thought than scholars and they play an important role in pushing the individual liberation forward, so further attention should be paid to their thought. Yan Shi to has made an attempt that history should be used to make a study of ' transcendence' of ancient people and thus the key points are China's identity and discrimination between China and other states. Fang Xudong thinks that the subject of history of thought is so special that its legal status is suspicious. It cannot be established unless it sums up time spirit as its object of research.