摘要
刑事证明责任是指在审判终结时,案件的某一要件事实处于真伪不明的状态,由控辩双方的哪一方来承担因此事实不明而带来的实体法上的不利后果。基于此就可得出如下结论:证明责任以证明落空为前提,与控辩双方在审判中的具体证明活动没有关联;证明责任的负担者与证明主体并不一致;证明责任是法院用来克服真伪不明并依法做出裁判的“最后手段”,所以法院绝不会成为证明责任的负担者。
The criminal burden of proof refers to the bad result that either the public prosecutor or the defender will shoulder when the trial finished,a certain required fact is non liquet.Therefore,we can make these conclusions: according to the precondition of no poof,the burden of proof does not relate to the testification of both the public prosecutor and the defender;the undertaker of the burden of proof does not accord with the attester;the court will use 'last method' as the burden of proof to overcome the non liquet and make the decision,so the court is not the undertaker of the burden of proof.
出处
《行政与法》
2005年第1期124-126,共3页
Administration and Law
基金
湖南师范大学法学院2003年院级基金课题。
关键词
证明责任
行为责任
证明
证明主体
Burden of Proof
Burden of Producing Evidence
Prove
Attesttator