期刊文献+

有限椎板切除术对腰椎管狭窄及中央型腰椎间盘突出的治疗作用 被引量:3

Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and central disc herniation with limited laminectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价有限椎板切除术对腰椎管狭窄症以及中央型腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法:对我科2000年1月至2003年12月期间随访的采用有限椎板切除术治疗的137例腰椎管狭窄症和(或)中央型腰椎间盘突出症患者的术后症状改善情况进行调查评价。结果:本组病例总数137例,其中男78例,女59例,平均年龄45.6岁,随访时间最长15个月,最短1个月,平均6个月。术后腰痛改善总有效率83%,腿痛改善总有效率96%,仅1例病人由于椎间盘复发行再手术椎间融合治疗。结论:有限椎板切除术能够有效地治疗腰椎管狭窄症以及中央型腰椎间盘突出症,而且能够更好地保存脊椎稳定结构而大大降低并发症的发病率。目的:评价有限椎板切除术对腰椎管狭窄症以及中央型腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法:对我科2000年1月至2003年12月期间随访的采用有限椎板切除术治疗的137例腰椎管狭窄症和(或)中央型腰椎间盘突出症患者的术后症状改善情况进行调查评价。结果:本组病例总数137例,其中男78例,女59例,平均年龄45.6岁,随访时间最长15个月,最短1个月,平均6个月。术后腰痛改善总有效率83%,腿痛改善总有效率96%,仅1例病人由于椎间盘复发行再手术椎间融合治疗。结论:有限椎板切除术能够有效地治疗腰椎管狭窄症以及中央型腰椎间盘突出症,而且能够更好地保存脊? Objective To investigate the effect of limited laminectomy on treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and central disc herniation. Methods One hundred and thirty seven patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or central disc herniation surgically treated with limited laminectomy were retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to November 2003. Postoperative follow up were made by symptomatology to evaluate effect of limited laminectomy. Results Overall improvement postoperatively was noted in 83%of back pain or 96%of leg pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and/or central disc herniation. Only one patient had undergone subsequent fusion of the lumbar spine after laminectomy. Conclusion The limited laminectomy could better preserve the spinal natural architecture and may contribute to improve postoperative stability. The limited laminectomy is a good alternative to total laminectomy.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 2005年第2期146-147,共2页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Eng J Med, 1988, 318(5):291 - 300.
  • 2Errico TJ, Fardon DF, Lowell TD, et al. Open discectomy as treatment for herniated nucleus pulposus of the lumbar spine. Spinal J,2003, 3 (3 Suppl): 45S-49S.
  • 3Eule JM, Breeze R, Kindt GW, et al. Bilateral partial laminectomy: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis and midline disc herniation. Surg Neurol, 1999, 52(4): 329-338.
  • 4Nasea RJ. Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine,1987, 12(8): 809-816.
  • 5Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A, et al. Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar stenosis. Spine, 1986, 14(6):591 - 593.
  • 6Getty CJM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: the clinical spectrum and the results of operation. JBJS, 1980, 62B(4): 481 -485.
  • 7Deen HG Jr, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, et al. Analysis of early failures after lumbar decompressive laminectomy for spinal stenosis.Mayo Clin Pro, 1995, 70(1): 33 -36.
  • 8Fox MW, Onoffio BM, Hassen AD. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression atone. J Neurosurg, 1996, 85(5):793 - 802.
  • 9Deyo RA, Coil MA, Cherkin DC, et al. Lumbar spinal fusion: a cohort of study complications, reoperations, and resource in the Medicare population. Spine, 1993, 18(11): 1463 - 1470.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部