期刊文献+

治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹用药方案的成本-效果分析 被引量:1

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Regimens for Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对3种慢性特发性荨麻疹治疗方案进行成本-效果分析。方法:根据文献资料,选择96例慢性特发性荨麻疹病人,随机分为咪唑斯汀组、西替利嗪组和氯雷他定组,运用药物经济学方法对3个治疗组进行最小成本、成本-效果比及增加成本-增效比的比较分析。结果:3组疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05),西替利嗪组费用成本最低,为3组方案中最优选方案。结论:通过药物经济学方法对用药方案进行成本-效果分析,为临床治疗方案的选择提供参考。 Objective: To make cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 regimens for treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Methods: On the basis of clinical data that have been published, 96 cases with chronic idiopathic urticaria were randomly divided into 3 groups, in which they were treated with mizolastine, cetirizine and loratadine respectively. The cost-effectiveness of 3 reqimens was analyzed and compared with each other by pharmacoeconomical methods. Results: There is no significant differece in the effectiveness of 3 treatment groups, however, the cost of cetirizine group was the lowest. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness analysis of dosing regimens by pharmacoeconomical methods is helpful to select better clinical treatment.
作者 张南生 李明
出处 《药学进展》 CAS 2004年第12期558-560,共3页 Progress in Pharmaceutical Sciences
关键词 慢性特发性荨麻疹 药物经济学 成本-效果分析 Chronic idiopathic urticaria, Pharmacoeconomics, Cost-eifectiveness analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

  • 1[2]Dubertret L, Murrieta Aguttes M, Tonet J. Efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10 mg in a placebo-controlled comparison with loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: results of the MILOR Study[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 1999, 12(1): 16-24.
  • 2[3]Rosenzweig P, Caplain H, Chanfour S, et al. Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol,1995, 40(5): 459-465.
  • 3[1]Prakash A, Lamb HM. Mizolastine: a review of its use in allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria[J]. Biodrug, 1998, 10(10): 42-59.
  • 4Ring J,Clin Exp Allergy,1999年,29卷,suppl 1期,31页
  • 5Devalia JL, De Vos C, Hanotte F, et al. A randomized, doubleblind, crossover comparison among cetirizine, levocetirizine, and ucb 28557 on histamine-induced cutaneous responses in healthy adult volunteers[J]. Allergy, 2001, 56(1): 50-57.
  • 6Clough GF, Boutsiouki P, Church MK. Comparison of the effects of levocetirizine and loratadine on histamine-induced wheal,flare, and itch in human skin[J]. Allergy, 2001, 56(10): 985-988.
  • 7Laurence M, Francette J, Veronique L, et al. Pharmacological study of levocetirizine in IgE-dependent hypersensitivity cutaneous reaction in grass pollen allergic volunteers: demonstreation of mediator release and eosinophil recruitment modulation by levocetirizine[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 2001, 117(3): 764-820.

共引文献71

同被引文献29

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部