期刊文献+

科学观的“涨落”与教育管理领域的发展

The Fluctuation of Science Perspectives and the Development of Field of Educational Administration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自泰勒时代,理论运动发展至今,教育管理理论科学观一直处于“涨落”的状态,科学观决定了在教育管理中研究领域的范围,并影响了研究范式的采用。走出当代教育管理领域理论范式之争的混乱局面应当从转变科学观开始。 Science perspectives of educational administration theory have been fluctuating since the era of Taylor. Science perspectives determine the scope of field of study in educational administration,and affect the choice of research paradigms. To find a better way to do educational administrational researches depends on the transformation of the science perspectives.
作者 秦晶晶
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期57-61,共5页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 科学观 教育管理 领域 science perspective educational administration field
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1程晋宽.论西方教育管理研究范式的转换[J].比较教育研究,2003,24(6):13-19. 被引量:13
  • 2蔡怡.西方教育管理理论运动述评[J].江苏高教,2003(4):122-124. 被引量:4
  • 3Jack A. Culbertson. A Century's Quest for a Knowledge Base [A]. Norman J. Boyan Ed. Handbook of Research on Educational Administration [C]. London:Longman Inc., 1988.
  • 4Callahan,R E . Education and the cult of effciency[M]. Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  • 5Jack A.Culbertson. Theory in educational administration:Echoes from critical thinkers [J]. Educational Researcher, 1983,12(10).
  • 6Evers,Colin W.,Lakomski,Cabriele. Science in Educational Administration:a postpositivist conception[J]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1996,32(3).
  • 7Thomas Greenfield and Peter RAbbim. Science and Service:The making of the profession of educational administration[A]. Greenfield T ,Ribbins P . Greenfiled on educational administration:towards a humane science [C]. London :Routledge, 1993.
  • 8Griffths,D E . Administrative theory[A]. N J Boyan (Ed). Handbook of research on educational administration[C]. New York:Longman,1988.
  • 9Lakatos,I. Lectures on scientific method[A]. M. Motterlini (Ed). For and against method[C]. Chicago,lL:University of Chicago Press,1999.
  • 10English,F W . The point of scientificity,the fall of the epistemological dominos,and the end of the filed of educational administration, Studies in Philosophy and Education [C]. Netherlands:Kluwer Acadamic Publishers,2002.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Dennis Philips, (1983), After the Wake: Postpositivistie Educational Thought, Educational Researcher, May 1983, pp.4-12.
  • 2Culbertson, J., (1988), A Century'S Quest for Knowledge Base, In N. J. Boyan (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, New York: Longnan, pp.3-26.
  • 3Fenwick W. English, (1994), Theory in Educational Administration, New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, pp. 100-135.
  • 4Willower, Donald J., (1996), Inquiry in Educational Administration and the Spirit of the Times, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32, No.3, (August 1996), pp.344-365.
  • 5Evers, Colin W., Lakomski, Gabriele (1996). Science in Educational Administration: a postpositivist conception, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 32, No.3, pp. 379 - 402 . pp. 379 - 402 . pp. 379 - 402 .
  • 6English, Fenwick W., (2001), What Paradighm Shift? An Interrogation of Kuhn's Idea of Normalcy in the Research Practice of Educational Adminisiration., International Journal of leadership in Education, Vol.4, No. I, 29 - 38.
  • 7Hoy, Wayne K., (1994), Foundation of Educational Administration: traditional and emerging perspectives, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 30, No.2, pp.178-198.
  • 8Feyerabend, P, (1995), Problems of Empiricism: philosophical papers, Vol.2, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 25.
  • 9Foster, W. P., (1986), Paradigms and Promises, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, p.35.p.48.
  • 10Daniel E. Griffithes, Administrative Theory ( New York: Applenton - Century - Crofts , 1959).

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部